Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCruz Rivera, Samantha
dc.contributor.authorTorlinska, Barbara
dc.contributor.authorMarston, Eliot
dc.contributor.authorDenniston, Alastair K
dc.contributor.authorOliver, Kathy
dc.contributor.authorHoare, Steve
dc.contributor.authorCalvert, Melanie J
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-11T12:05:31Z
dc.date.available2024-04-11T12:05:31Z
dc.date.issued2021-02-16
dc.identifier.citationCruz Rivera S, Torlinska B, Marston E, Denniston AK, Oliver K, Hoare S, Calvert MJ. Advancing UK Regulatory Science Strategy in the Context of Global Regulation: a Stakeholder Survey. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2021 Jul;55(4):646-655. doi: 10.1007/s43441-021-00263-2. Epub 2021 Feb 16en_US
dc.identifier.issn2168-4790
dc.identifier.eissn2168-4804
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s43441-021-00263-2
dc.identifier.pmid33591566
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14200/4181
dc.description.abstractBackground: The UK's transition from the European Union creates both an urgent need and key opportunity for the UK and its global collaborators to consider new approaches to the regulation of emerging technologies, underpinned by regulatory science. This survey aimed to identify the most accurate definition of regulatory science, to define strategic areas of the regulation of healthcare innovation which can be informed through regulatory science and to explore the training and infrastructure needed to advance UK and international regulatory science. Methods: A survey was distributed to UK healthcare professionals, academics, patients, health technology assessment agencies, ethicists and trade associations, as well as international regulators, pharmaceutical companies and small or medium enterprises which have expertise in regulatory science and in developing or applying regulation in healthcare. Subsequently, a descriptive quantitative analyses of survey results and directed thematic analysis of free-text comments were applied. Results: Priority areas for UK regulatory science identified by 145 participants included the following: flexibility: the capability of regulations to adapt to novel products and target patient outcomes; co-development: collaboration across sectors, e.g. patients, manufacturers, regulators, and educators working together to develop appropriate training for novel product deployment; responsiveness: the preparation of frameworks which enable timely innovation required by emerging events; speed: the rate at which new products can reach the market; reimbursement: developing effective tools to track and evaluate outcomes for "pay for performance" products; and education and professional development. Conclusions: The UK has a time-critical opportunity to establish its national and international strategy for regulatory science leadership by harnessing broader academic input, developing strategic cross-sector collaborations, incorporating patients' experiences and perspectives, and investing in a skilled workforce.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.urlhttps://journals.sagepub.com/home/dijen_US
dc.subjectPatients. Primary care. Medical profession. Forensic medicineen_US
dc.titleAdvancing UK Regulatory science strategy in the context of global regulation: a stakeholder survey.en_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.source.journaltitleTherapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science
dc.source.volume55
dc.source.issue4
dc.source.beginpage646
dc.source.endpage655
dc.source.countryUnited Kingdom
dc.source.countrySwitzerland
rioxxterms.versionNAen_US
dc.contributor.trustauthorDenniston, Alastair K
dc.contributor.departmentOphthalmologyen_US
dc.contributor.roleMedical and Dentalen_US
oa.grant.openaccessnaen_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record