Systematic analysis of approaches used in cardiac arrest trials to inform relatives about trial enrolment of non-surviving patients
Abstract
Background: The recruitment of patients to emergency research studies without the requirement for prior informed consent has furthered the conduct of randomised studies in cardiac arrest. Frameworks enabling this vary around the world depending on local legal or ethical requirements. When an enrolled patient does not survive, researchers may take one of three approaches to inform relatives of their enrolment: a direct (active) approach, providing information indirectly (passively) and inviting relatives to seek further information if they choose, or providing no information about the trial (no attempt). Previous studies have described experiences of US researchers' active approach but there is little known about approaches elsewhere.We aimed to conduct a structured investigation of methods used in cardiac arrest trials to provide information about trial enrolment to relatives of non-surviving patients. Methods: We systematically searched trial registries to identify randomised clinical trials that recruited cardiac arrest patients. Trials were eligible for inclusion if they recruited adults during cardiac arrest (or within 1 hour of return of spontaneous circulation) between 2010 and 2022 (in the decade prior to study conception). We extracted data from trial registries and, where relevant, published papers and protocols. Investigators were contacted and asked to describe the style, rationale and timing of approach to relatives of non-surviving patients. We present descriptive statistics. Results: Our trial registry search identified 710 unique trials, of which 108 were eligible for inclusion. We obtained information from investigators for 64 (62%) trials. Approximately equal numbers of trials attempted to actively inform relatives of non-survivors (n=28 (44% (95% CI; 31% to 57%))), or made no attempt (n=25 (39% (95% CI; 27% to 52%))). The remaining studies provided general information about the trial to relatives but did not actively inform them (n=11 (17% (95% CI; 8% to 29%))). Conclusions: There is wide variability in the approach taken to informing relatives of non-surviving patients enrolled in cardiac arrest randomised clinical trials.Citation
Pocock H, Dove A, Pointeer L, Couper K, Perkins GD. Systematic analysis of approaches used in cardiac arrest trials to inform relatives about trial enrolment of non-surviving patients. Emerg Med J. 2024 May 10:emermed-2023-213648. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2023-213648. Epub ahead of printType
ArticlePMID
38729750Journal
Emergency Medicine JournalPublisher
BMJ Publishing Groupae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1136/emermed-2023-213648