International consensus statement on allergy and rhinology: olfaction.
Author
Patel, Zara MHolbrook, Eric H
Turner, Justin H
Adappa, Nithin D
Albers, Mark W
Altundag, Aytug
Appenzeller, Simone
Costanzo, Richard M
Croy, Ilona
Davis, Greg E
Dehgani-Mobaraki, Puya
Doty, Richard L
Duffy, Valerie B
Goldstein, Bradley J
Gudis, David A
Haehner, Antje
Higgins, Thomas S
Hopkins, Claire
Huart, Caroline
Hummel, Thomas
Jitaroon, Kawinyarat
Kern, Robert C
Khanwalkar, Ashoke R
Kobayashi, Masayoshi
Kondo, Kenji
Lane, Andrew P
Lechner, Matt
Leopold, Donald A
Levy, Joshua M
Marmura, Michael J
Mclelland, Lisha
Miwa, Takaki
Moberg, Paul J
Mueller, Christian A
Nigwekar, Sagar U
O'Brien, Erin K
Paunescu, Teodor G
Pellegrino, Robert
Philpott, Carl
Pinto, Jayant M
Reiter, Evan R
Roalf, David R
Rowan, Nicholas R
Schlosser, Rodney J
Schwob, James
Seiden, Allen M
Smith, Timothy L
Soler, Zachary M
Sowerby, Leigh
Tan, Bruce K
Thamboo, Andrew
Wrobel, Bozena
Yan, Carol H
Publication date
2022-04
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Background: The literature regarding clinical olfaction, olfactory loss, and olfactory dysfunction has expanded rapidly over the past two decades, with an exponential rise in the past year. There is substantial variability in the quality of this literature and a need to consolidate and critically review the evidence. It is with that aim that we have gathered experts from around the world to produce this International Consensus on Allergy and Rhinology: Olfaction (ICAR:O). Methods: Using previously described methodology, specific topics were developed relating to olfaction. Each topic was assigned a literature review, evidence-based review, or evidence-based review with recommendations format as dictated by available evidence and scope within the ICAR:O document. Following iterative reviews of each topic, the ICAR:O document was integrated and reviewed by all authors for final consensus. Results: The ICAR:O document reviews nearly 100 separate topics within the realm of olfaction, including diagnosis, epidemiology, disease burden, diagnosis, testing, etiology, treatment, and associated pathologies. Conclusion: This critical review of the existing clinical olfaction literature provides much needed insight and clarity into the evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment of patients with olfactory dysfunction, while also clearly delineating gaps in our knowledge and evidence base that we should investigate further.Citation
Patel ZM, Holbrook EH, Turner JH, Adappa ND, Albers MW, Altundag A, Appenzeller S, Costanzo RM, Croy I, Davis GE, Dehgani-Mobaraki P, Doty RL, Duffy VB, Goldstein BJ, Gudis DA, Haehner A, Higgins TS, Hopkins C, Huart C, Hummel T, Jitaroon K, Kern RC, Khanwalkar AR, Kobayashi M, Kondo K, Lane AP, Lechner M, Leopold DA, Levy JM, Marmura MJ, Mclelland L, Miwa T, Moberg PJ, Mueller CA, Nigwekar SU, O'Brien EK, Paunescu TG, Pellegrino R, Philpott C, Pinto JM, Reiter ER, Roalf DR, Rowan NR, Schlosser RJ, Schwob J, Seiden AM, Smith TL, Soler ZM, Sowerby L, Tan BK, Thamboo A, Wrobel B, Yan CH. International consensus statement on allergy and rhinology: Olfaction. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2022 Apr;12(4):327-680. doi: 10.1002/alr.22929. Erratum in: Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2023 Sep;13(9):1844. doi: 10.1002/alr.23163Type
CorrigendumAdditional Links
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)2042-6984PMID
35373533Publisher
Wiley-Blackwellae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1002/alr.22929