Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBiswas, A
dc.contributor.authorMarimuthu, K
dc.contributor.authorMathew, G
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-27T14:31:54Z
dc.date.available2024-06-27T14:31:54Z
dc.date.issued2015-01
dc.identifier.citationBiswas A, Marimuthu K, Mathew G. Prevention of Parastomal Hernia Using Pre-peritoneal Mesh - Long Term Outcome of a Prospective Study. Acta Chir Belg. 2015 Jan;115(1):15-9. doi: 10.1080/00015458.2015.11681061.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0001-5458
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/00015458.2015.11681061
dc.identifier.pmid27384891
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14200/4981
dc.description.abstractBackground: Parastomal hernia is a frequent complication after stoma formation. The objective of this prospective study was to find long-term outcome of prophylactic mesh placement in the pre-peritoneal space in order to prevent parastomal hernia. Methods: Patients undergoing elective formation of permanent stoma were included in the study. A polypropylene mesh was placed in the pre-peritoneal space without any anchoring stitches and bowel was taken out through a central circular hole made in the mesh. These patients were followed up for 5 years-by clinical examination and CT scan when needed. Results: A total of 42 patients were included in the study. These patients were followed up for a median period of 60 months (range 32-100 months). Twelve patients died before the 5-year follow up due to causes unrelated to stoma. As two patients were unable to be contacted, 28 patients remained in the long-term follow up. Three cases of parastomal hernia were detected after 5 years. None of these patients required repairing of the parastomal hernia. However, a previous study conducted 3 years ago found 4 cases of parastomal hernia that was treated by resiting the stomas. Therefore the total number of parastomal hernia detected in our series is 7 (incidence 25%). Conclusion: Putting a pre-peritoneal polypropylene mesh is an easy, quick and inexpensive method, and easy to learn. The outcome is better than creating stomas without mesh, but further studies are needed to explore potential benefits of different types of mesh and their methods of positioning and anchoring.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen_US
dc.subjectSurgeryen_US
dc.titlePrevention of parastomal hernia using pre-peritoneal mesh - long term outcome of a prospective studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.source.journaltitleActa Chirurgica Belgicaen_US
rioxxterms.versionNAen_US
rioxxterms.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.trustauthorBiswas, A.
dc.contributor.trustauthorMarimuthu, K.
dc.contributor.trustauthorMathew, G.
dc.contributor.departmentSurgeryen_US
dc.contributor.roleMedical and Dentalen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationGeorge Eliot Hospital, Nuneatonen_US
oa.grant.openaccessnaen_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record