Show simple item record

dc.relation.isnodouble5425*
dc.contributor.authorBailey, Mark S
dc.contributor.authorGurney, I
dc.contributor.authorLentaigne, J
dc.contributor.authorBiswas, J S
dc.contributor.authorHill, N E
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-12T12:27:00Z
dc.date.available2024-07-12T12:27:00Z
dc.date.issued2019-04-20
dc.identifier.citationBailey MS, Gurney I, Lentaigne J, Biswas JS, Hill NE. Clinical activity at the UK military level 2 hospital in Bentiu, South Sudan during Op TRENTON from June to September 2017. BMJ Mil Health. 2021 Oct;167(5):304-309. doi: 10.1136/jramc-2018-001154. Epub 2019 Apr 20en_US
dc.identifier.issn2633-3767
dc.identifier.eissn2633-3775
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/jramc-2018-001154
dc.identifier.pmid31005887
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14200/5104
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Diseases and non-battle injuries (DNBIs) are common on UK military deployments, but the collection and analysis of clinically useful data on these remain a challenge. Standard medical returns do not provide adequate clinical information, and clinician-led approaches have been laudable, but not integrated nor standardised nor used long-term. Op TRENTON is a novel UK military humanitarian operation in support of the United Nations Mission in South Sudan, which included the deployment of UK military level 1 and level 2 medical treatment facilities at Bentiu to provide healthcare for UK and United Nations (UN) personnel. Methods: A service evaluation of patient consultations and admissions at the UK military level 2 hospital was performed using two data sets collected by the emergency department (ED) and medicine (MED) teams. Results: Over a three-month (13-week) period, 286 cases were seen, of which 51% were UK troops, 29% were UN civilians and 20% were UN troops. The ED team saw 175 cases (61%) and provided definitive care for 113 (40%), whereas the MED team saw and provided definitive care for 128 cases (45%). Overall, there were 75% with diseases and 25% with non-battle injuries. The most common diagnoses seen by the ED team were musculoskeletal injuries (17%), unidentified non-malarial undifferentiated febrile illness (UNMUFI) (17%), malaria (13%), chemical pneumonitis (13%) and wounds (8%). The most common diagnoses seen by the MED team were acute gastroenteritis (AGE) (56%), UNMUFI (12%) and malaria (9%). AGE was due to viruses (31%), diarrhoeagenic Escherichia coli (32%), other bacteria (6%) and protozoa (12%). Conclusion: Data collection on DNBIs during the initial phase of this deployment was clinically useful and integrated between different departments. However, a standardised, long-term solution that is embedded into deployed healthcare is required. The clinical activity recorded here should be used for planning, training, service development and targeted research.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Groupen_US
dc.relation.urlhttps://militaryhealth.bmj.comen_US
dc.rights© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
dc.subjectEmergency medicineen_US
dc.subjectRespiratory medicineen_US
dc.subjectEndocrinologyen_US
dc.subjectDiabetesen_US
dc.titleClinical activity at the UK military level 2 hospital in Bentiu, South Sudan during Op TRENTON from June to September 2017.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.source.journaltitleBMJ Military Healthen_US
dc.source.volume167
dc.source.issue5
dc.source.beginpage304
dc.source.endpage309
dc.source.countryEngland
rioxxterms.versionNAen_US
dc.contributor.trustauthorBailey, Mark
dc.contributor.departmentInfectious Diseasesen_US
dc.contributor.roleMedical and Dentalen_US
oa.grant.openaccessnaen_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record