• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust
    • Staff Publications
    • 2024
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust
    • Staff Publications
    • 2024
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of West Midlands Evidence RepositoryCommunitiesAuthorsTitlesPublication DateSubjectsPublication TypesJournalPublisherThis CollectionAuthorsTitlesPublication DateSubjectsPublication TypesJournalPublisherProfilesView

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    About

    AboutPolicies Privacy NoticeBlack Country Healthcare NHS Foundation TrustCoventry and Warwickshire Partnership NHS TrustDudley Group NHS Foundation TrustGeorge Eliot Hospital NHS TrustSandwell and West Birmingham NHS TrustSouth Warwickshire University NHS Foundation TrustUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation TrustUniversity Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS TrustWalsall Healthcare NHS Trust

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Minimally invasive surgery for Inflammatory Bowel Disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic surgical techniques.

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Author
    Zaman, Shafquat
    Mohamedahmed, Ali Yasen Y
    Abdelrahman, Widad
    Abdalla, Hashim E
    Wuheb, Ali A
    Issa, Mohamed T
    Faiz, Nameer
    Yassin, Nuha A
    Affiliation
    Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust; University of Birmingham, Edgbaston; Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust; The Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust.
    Publication date
    2024-03-11
    Subject
    Gastroenterology
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    To evaluate outcomes of robotic versus conventional laparoscopic colorectal resections in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Comparative studies of robotic versus laparoscopic colorectal resections in patients with IBD were included. Primary outcome was total post-operative complication rate. Secondary outcomes included operative time, conversion to open surgery, anastomotic leaks, intra-abdominal abscess formation, ileus occurrence, surgical site infection, re-operation, re-admission rate, length of hospital stay, and 30-day mortality. Combined overall effect sizes were calculated using random-effects model and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess risk of bias. Eleven non-randomised studies (n=5,566 patients) divided between those undergoing robotic (n=365) and conventional laparoscopic (n=5,201) surgery were included. Robotic platforms were associated with a significantly lower overall post-operative complication rate compared with laparoscopic surgery (P=0.03).Laparoscopic surgery was associated with a significantly shorter operative time (P=0.00001). No difference was found in conversion rates to open surgery (P=0.15), anastomotic leaks (P=0.84), abscess formation (P=0.21), paralytic ileus (P=0.06), surgical site infections (P=0.78), re-operation (P=0.26), re-admission rate (P=0.48), and 30-day mortality (P=1.00) between the groups.Length of hospital stay was shorter following a robotic sub-total colectomy compared with conventional laparoscopy (P=0.03). Outcomes in the surgical management of IBD are comparable between traditional laparoscopic techniques and robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery demonstrating the safety and feasibility of robotic platforms. Larger studies investigating the use of robotic technology in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis separately may be of benefit with specific focus on important IBD-related metrics.
    Citation
    Zaman S, Mohamedahmed AYY, Abdelrahman W, Abdalla HE, Wuheb AA, Issa MT, Faiz N, Yassin NA. Minimally invasive surgery for Inflammatory Bowel Disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic surgical techniques. J Crohns Colitis. 2024 Mar 11:jjae037. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjae037. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 38466108.
    Handle
    http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14200/5219
    DOI
    10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjae037
    PMID
    38466108
    Publisher
    Oxford Academic
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjae037
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    2024

    entitlement

    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2025)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.