Azithromycin versus standard care in patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 (ATOMIC2): an open-label, randomised trial.
Name:
Publisher version
View Source
Access full-text PDFOpen Access
View Source
Check access options
Check access options
Author
Hinks, Timothy S CCureton, Lucy
Knight, Ruth
Wang, Ariel
Cane, Jennifer L
Barber, Vicki S
Black, Joanna
Dutton, Susan J
Melhorn, James
Jabeen, Maisha
Moss, Phil
Garlapati, Rajendar
Baron, Tanya
Johnson, Graham
Cantle, Fleur
Clarke, David
Elkhodair, Samer
Underwood, Jonathan
Lasserson, Daniel

Pavord, Ian D
Morgan, Sophie
Richards, Duncan
Affiliation
University of Oxford; University Hospital Llandough; St George's Hospital; Sandwell and West Birmingham NHS TrustPublication date
2021-07-09Subject
Respiratory medicine
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Background: The antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, and antiviral properties of azithromycin suggest therapeutic potential against COVID-19. Randomised data in mild-to-moderate disease are not available. We assessed whether azithromycin is effective in reducing hospital admission in patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19. Methods: This prospective, open-label, randomised superiority trial was done at 19 hospitals in the UK. We enrolled adults aged at least 18 years presenting to hospitals with clinically diagnosed, highly probable or confirmed COVID-19 infection, with fewer than 14 days of symptoms, who were considered suitable for initial ambulatory management. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to azithromycin (500 mg once daily orally for 14 days) plus standard care or to standard care alone. The primary outcome was death or hospital admission from any cause over the 28 days from randomisation. The primary and safety outcomes were assessed according to the intention-to-treat principle. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04381962) and recruitment is closed. Findings: 298 participants were enrolled from June 3, 2020, to Jan 29, 2021. Three participants withdrew consent and requested removal of all data, and three further participants withdrew consent after randomisation, thus, the primary outcome was assessed in 292 participants (145 in the azithromycin group and 147 in the standard care group). The mean age of the participants was 45·9 years (SD 14·9). 15 (10%) participants in the azithromycin group and 17 (12%) in the standard care group were admitted to hospital or died during the study (adjusted OR 0·91 [95% CI 0·43-1·92], p=0·80). No serious adverse events were reported. Interpretation: In patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 managed without hospital admission, adding azithromycin to standard care treatment did not reduce the risk of subsequent hospital admission or death. Our findings do not support the use of azithromycin in patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19.Citation
Hinks TSC, Cureton L, Knight R, Wang A, Cane JL, Barber VS, Black J, Dutton SJ, Melhorn J, Jabeen M, Moss P, Garlapati R, Baron T, Johnson G, Cantle F, Clarke D, Elkhodair S, Underwood J, Lasserson D, Pavord ID, Morgan S, Richards D. Azithromycin versus standard care in patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 (ATOMIC2): an open-label, randomised trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2021 Oct;9(10):1130-1140. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00263-0. Epub 2021 Jul 9. Erratum in: Lancet Respir Med. 2021 Oct;9(10):e102.Type
ArticleOther
PMID
34252378Journal
The Lancet Respiratory MedicinePublisher
Elsevierae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00263-0