Women's health inequalities in 15 Muslim-populated countries : evidence from population and mortality statistics
Abstract
In this study, we examined health inequalities and the status of women as evidenced in the patterns of population and mortality statistics in fifteen Muslim-populated countries. Based on WHO data, female-to-male ratios were calculated to determine differential gender ratios of population and mortality, using Western gender patterns as a baseline. The socioeconomic contexts of the analysis were the percentage of women in parliaments data by OECD and the Gross National Income Per Capita PPP by the World Bank. The study results indicate that former USSR countries had fewer girls, suggesting gender selection, whilst fewer adult women in the Gulf States population indicate health inequalities. Female children’s mortality was under-reported, inferring under-valuing girls. Higher female adult deaths in Egypt, Iran, and the Gulf States show greater discrimination. Women in the richest Muslim countries face more inequalities and less representation in Parliament. The implications of the study are discussed.Citation
Pritchard, C., Abdul Azeez, E. P., & Mirza, S. (2023). Women’s health inequalities in 15 Muslim-populated countries: Evidence from population and mortality statistics. Health Care for Women International, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/07399332.2023.2233093Type
ArticlePMID
37450643Publisher
Taylor & Francisae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1080/07399332.2023.2233093
Scopus Count
Collections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Role of the Guidelines Evidence Specialist in the streamlining of Guidelines at a large acute NHS TrustHeer, Mandeep; Heer, Mandeep; Heer, Mandeep; CEBIS; CEBIS (University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, 2023-11)Role of the Guidelines Evidence Specialist in the streamlining of Guidelines at a large acute NHS Trust
-
Enhancing wellbeing in medical practice: Exploring interventions and effectiveness for improving the work lives of resident (junior) doctors: A systematic review and narrative synthesis.Hirayama, Yuri; Khan, Sunera; Gill, Charn; Thoburn, Maxwell; Hancox, Jennifer; Muzaffar, Jameel; Hiriyama, Yuri; Khan, Sunera; Gill, Charn; Hancox, Jennifer; et al. (Elsevier Ltd, 2024-10-16)Introduction: Globally, resident doctors face challenges like long work hours, critical decision-making stress, and exposure to death and distress, prompting concern for their wellbeing. This study addresses the need for interventions to improve their working conditions, vital for enhancing quality of life, patient care and retaining a skilled workforce. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic literature review until 3 January 2024 explored interventions for resident Ddoctors pre- and post-COVID-19. It evaluated intervention effectiveness, metrics and feasibility, excluding studies with high bias risk. Results: The review identified diverse interventions, from mentoring to wellness resources, showing significant improvements in job satisfaction, mental health and professional growth among resident doctors. Due to methodological variations, a narrative synthesis was conducted. Conclusion: Effective interventions addressing resident doctors' challenges can notably enhance their wellbeing and job satisfaction. Scaling such interventions is vital for fostering supportive work environments, sustaining the healthcare workforce and improving patient care quality.
-
Faculty development: clinical dermatology for medical secretaries and administrative staffAgrawal, Rishi; Browne, Rachel; Baldwin, Nicola; Scott, H.; Tso, Simon; Agrawal, R.; Browne, R.; Baldwin, N.; Scott, H.; Tso, S.; et al. (Oxford University Press, 2020-06)A study investigating the potential benefits of specialty-specific clinical inductions for medical secretaries and administrative staff.