Paediatric major incident triage: UK military tool offers best performance in predicting the need for time-critical major surgical and resuscitative intervention
Name:
Publisher version
View Source
Access full-text PDFOpen Access
View Source
Check access options
Check access options
Author
Malik, Nabeela SChernbumroong, Saisakul
Xu, Yuanwei
Vassallo, James
Lee, Justine
Moran, Christopher G
Newton, Tina
Arul, G Suren
Lord, Janet M
Belli, Antonio
Keene, Damian
Foster, Mark
Hodgetts, Timothy
Bowley, Douglas M
Gkoutos, Georgios V
Affiliation
Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust; University of Birmingham; 212 (Yorkshire) Field Hospital; Royal Centre for Defence Medicine; University Hospitals Birmingham; NHS England London; Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust; Birmingham Children's Hospital; Headquarters Defence Medical Services; MRC Health Data Research UK (HDR UK)Publication date
2021-08-23
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Background: Children are frequently injured during major incidents (MI), including terrorist attacks, conflict and natural disasters. Triage facilitates healthcare resource allocation in order to maximise overall survival. A critical function of MI triage tools is to identify patients needing time-critical major resuscitative and surgical intervention (Priority 1 (P1) status). This study compares the performance of 11 MI triage tools in predicting P1 status in children from the UK Trauma Audit and Research Network (TARN) registry. Methods: Patients aged <16 years within TARN (January 2008-December 2017) were included. 11 triage tools were applied to patients' first recorded pre-hospital physiology. Patients were retrospectively assigned triage categories (P1, P2, P3, Expectant or Dead) using predefined intervention-based criteria. Tools' performance in <16s were evaluated within four-yearly age subgroups, comparing tool-predicted and intervention-based priority status. Findings: Amongst 4962 patients, mortality was 1.1% (n = 53); median Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 9 (IQR 9-16). Blunt injuries predominated (94.4%). 1343 (27.1%) met intervention-based criteria for P1, exhibiting greater intensive care requirement (60.2% vs. 8.5%, p < 0.01) and ISS (median 17 vs 9, p < 0.01) compared with P2 patients. The Battlefield Casualty Drills (BCD) Triage Sieve had greatest sensitivity (75.7%) in predicting P1 status in children <16 years, demonstrating a 38.4-49.8% improvement across all subgroups of children <12 years compared with the UK's current Paediatric Triage Tape (PTT). JumpSTART demonstrated low sensitivity in predicting P1 status in 4 to 8 year olds (35.5%) and 0 to 4 year olds (28.5%), and was outperformed by its adult counterpart START (60.6% and 59.6%). Interpretation: The BCD Triage Sieve had greatest sensitivity in predicting P1 status in this paediatric trauma registry population: we recommend it replaces the PTT in UK practice. Users of JumpSTART may consider alternative tools. We recommend Lerner's triage category definitions when conducting MI evaluations.Citation
Malik NS, Chernbumroong S, Xu Y, Vassallo J, Lee J, Moran CG, Newton T, Arul GS, Lord JM, Belli A, Keene D, Foster M, Hodgetts T, Bowley DM, Gkoutos GV. Paediatric major incident triage: UK military tool offers best performance in predicting the need for time-critical major surgical and resuscitative intervention. EClinicalMedicine. 2021 Aug 23;40:101100. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101100.Type
ArticleAdditional Links
https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/eclinicalmedicinePMID
34746717Journal
EClinicalMedicinePublisher
Elsevierae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101100