• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
    • Surgery
    • Trauma and Orthopaedics
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
    • Surgery
    • Trauma and Orthopaedics
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of West Midlands Evidence RepositoryCommunitiesAuthorsTitlesPublication DateSubjectsPublication TypesJournalPublisherThis CollectionAuthorsTitlesPublication DateSubjectsPublication TypesJournalPublisherProfilesView

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    About

    AboutPolicies Privacy NoticeBlack Country Healthcare NHS Foundation TrustCoventry and Warwickshire Partnership NHS TrustDudley Group NHS Foundation TrustGeorge Eliot Hospital NHS TrustSandwell and West Birmingham NHS TrustSouth Warwickshire University NHS Foundation TrustUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation TrustUniversity Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS TrustWalsall Healthcare NHS Trust

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Management of fracture-related infection in low resource settings: how applicable are the current consensus guidelines?

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Author
    Tissingh, Elizabeth K
    Marais, Leonard
    Loro, Antonio
    Bose, Deepa
    Paner, Nilo T
    Ferguson, Jamie
    Morgensten, Mario
    McNally, Martin
    Publication date
    2022-05-31
    Subject
    Orthopaedics
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    The global burden of fracture-related infection (FRI) is likely to be found in countries with limited healthcare resources and strategies are needed to ensure the best available practice is context appropriate. This study has two main aims: (i) to assess the applicability of recently published expert guidance from the FRI consensus groups on the diagnosis and management of FRI to low- and middle-income countries (LMICs); (ii) to summarise the available evidence on FRI, with consideration for strategies applicable to low resource settings. Data related to the International Consensus Meeting Orthopaedic Trauma Work Group and the International Fracture Related Infection Consensus Group FRI guidelines were collected including panel membership, country of origin, language of publication, open access status and impact factor of the journal of publication. The recommendations and guidelines were then summarised with specific consideration for relevance and applicability to LMICs. Barriers to implementation were explored within a group of LMIC residents and experienced workers. The authorship, evidence base and reach of the FRI consensus guidelines lack representation from low resource settings. The majority of authors (78.5-100%) are based in high-income countries and there are no low-income country collaborators listed in any of the papers. All papers are in English. The FRI consensus guidelines give a clear set of principles for the optimum management of FRI. Many of these - including the approach to diagnosis, multidisciplinary team working and some elements of surgical management - are achievable in low resource settings. Current evidence suggests that it is important that a core set of principles is prioritised but robust evidence for this is lacking. There are major organisational and infrastructure obstacles in LMICs that will make any standardisation of FRI diagnosis or management challenging. The detail of how FRI consensus principles should be applied in low resource settings requires further work. The important work presented in the current FRI consensus guidelines is relevant to low resource settings. However, leadership, collaboration, creativity and innovation will be needed to implement these strategies for communities who need it the most.
    Citation
    Tissingh EK, Marais L, Loro A, Bose D, Paner NT, Ferguson J, Morgensten M, McNally M. Management of fracture-related infection in low resource settings: how applicable are the current consensus guidelines? EFORT Open Rev. 2022 May 31;7(6):422-432. doi: 10.1530/EOR-22-0031
    Type
    Article
    Other
    Handle
    http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14200/5479
    Additional Links
    https://eor.bioscientifica.com/
    DOI
    10.1530/EOR-22-0031
    PMID
    35638596
    Journal
    EFORT Open Reviews
    Publisher
    BioScientifica
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1530/EOR-22-0031
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    Trauma and Orthopaedics

    entitlement

    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2025)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.