Knowledge and Practice in Cochlear Re-Implantation in the UK: A Survey for Audiologists.
dc.contributor.author | Ayas, Muhammed | |
dc.contributor.author | Parker, Rosalyn | |
dc.contributor.author | Muir, David | |
dc.contributor.author | Muzaffar, Jameel | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-08-28T10:11:07Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-08-28T10:11:07Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2024-07-17 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Ayas M, Parker R, Muir D, Muzaffar J. Knowledge and Practice in Cochlear Re-Implantation in the UK: A Survey for Audiologists. Audiol Res. 2024 Jul 17;14(4):649-658. doi: 10.3390/audiolres14040055. PMID: 39051199; PMCID: PMC11270342. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 2039-4330 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/audiolres14040055 | |
dc.identifier.pmid | 39051199 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14200/5524 | |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Cochlear implantation (CI) has proven to be a highly effective method for rehabilitating individuals with severe to profound hearing loss. However, challenges persist, particularly in cases where CI failure necessitates re-implantation. This study aims to address the gap in understanding the knowledge and practices of audiologists in the UK regarding cochlear re-implantation through a comprehensive questionnaire survey. Methods: A bespoke questionnaire was distributed to audiologists working with CI across the UK. The survey, which included multiple-choice items, open-text responses, and visual analogue scales, was made accessible via an online link shared through professional bodies, email groups, and social media platforms. Results: The survey received 27 responses, predominantly from female audiologists (71.4%), with significant representation from London (28.6%) and the East of England (21.4%). A majority of respondents had over 16 years of CI experience (35.7%) and held a master's degree (60.7%). Key reasons for CI re-implantation included electrode failure (82.1%) and hermetic seal failure (60.7%). While respondents showed strong confidence in counselling (88.8%) and managing re-implanted devices (84.6%), there was a noted variation in opinions regarding the need for additional training in intraoperative measures. Conclusion: This survey highlights the current practices and training needs of UK audiologists in CI re-implantation. This underscores the importance of targeted training to fill knowledge gaps and improve clinical care during CI re-implantation, ultimately enhancing outcomes for both audiologists and CI recipients. Keywords: audiologists; cochlear implants; knowledge; practices; programming; re-implantation; revision. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | MDPI | en_US |
dc.subject | Ear, Nose & Throat | en_US |
dc.title | Knowledge and Practice in Cochlear Re-Implantation in the UK: A Survey for Audiologists. | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.source.journaltitle | Audiology Research | en_US |
dc.source.volume | 14 | |
dc.source.issue | 4 | |
dc.source.beginpage | 649 | |
dc.source.endpage | 658 | |
dc.source.country | Switzerland | |
rioxxterms.version | NA | en_US |
dc.contributor.trustauthor | Muzaffar, Jameel | |
dc.contributor.department | Consultant Ear, Nose and Throat Surgeon | en_US |
dc.contributor.role | Medical and Dental | en_US |
oa.grant.openaccess | na | en_US |