Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMohamedahmed, A Y Y
dc.contributor.authorZaman, S
dc.contributor.authorWuheb, A A
dc.contributor.authorIsmail, A
dc.contributor.authorNnaji, M
dc.contributor.authorAlyamani, A A
dc.contributor.authorEltyeb, H A
dc.contributor.authorYassin, N A
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-28T10:48:31Z
dc.date.available2024-08-28T10:48:31Z
dc.date.issued2024-07-01
dc.identifier.citationMohamedahmed AYY, Zaman S, Wuheb AA, Ismail A, Nnaji M, Alyamani AA, Eltyeb HA, Yassin NA. Peri-operative, oncological and functional outcomes of robotic versus transanal total mesorectal excision in patients with rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Tech Coloproctol. 2024 Jul 1;28(1):75. doi: 10.1007/s10151-024-02947-x.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1123-6337
dc.identifier.eissn1128-045X
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10151-024-02947-x
dc.identifier.pmid38951249
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14200/5527
dc.description.abstractBackground: Comparative outcomes of robotic low anterior resection (rTME) and trans-anal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) in patients with low rectal cancer were evaluated. Methods: A systematic online search was conducted using the following databases: PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane database, The Virtual Health Library, Clinical trials.gov and Science Direct. Comparative studies of rTME versus TaTME for low rectal cancer were included. Primary outcomes were postoperative complications, including anastomotic leak, surgical site infection, and Clavien-Dindo complication rate. Total operative time, conversion to open surgery, intra-operative blood loss, intensive therapy unit (ITU) and total hospital length of stay (LOS), oncological outcomes and functional outcomes were the other evaluated outcome parameters. Results: A total of 12 studies with a total number of 3025 patients divided between rTME (n = 1881) and TaTME (n = 1144) groups were included. There was no significant difference between the two groups for total operative time (P = 0.39), conversion to open surgery (P = 0.29) and intra-operative blood loss (P = 0.62). Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3 complication rate (P = 0.47), anastomotic leak (P = 0.89), rates of re-operation (P = 0.62) and re-admission (P = 0.92), R0 resections (P = 0.52), ITU LOS (P = 0.63) and total hospital LOS (P = 0.30) also showed similar results between the two groups. However, the rTME group had higher rates of total harvested lymph nodes (P = 0.04) and complete total mesorectal excision (TME) resections (P = 0.05). Albeit with a limited dataset, the Wexner and low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) scores showed better functional results in the rTME group compared with the TaTME group (P = 0.0009 and P = 0.00001, respectively). Conclusion: Compared with TaTME, rTME seems to provide better functional outcomes, higher lymph node yield and more complete TME resections with a similar post-operative complications profile.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringer-Verlag Italiaen_US
dc.relation.urlhttps://link.springer.com/journal/10151en_US
dc.rights© 2024. Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
dc.subjectOncology. Pathology.en_US
dc.subjectSurgeryen_US
dc.titlePeri-operative, oncological and functional outcomes of robotic versus transanal total mesorectal excision in patients with rectal cancer : A systematic review and meta-analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.source.journaltitleTechniques in Coloproctologyen_US
dc.source.volume28
dc.source.issue1
dc.source.beginpage75
dc.source.endpage
dc.source.countryItaly
rioxxterms.versionNAen_US
oa.grant.openaccessnaen_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record