Management of primary retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) in the adult : an updated consensus approach from the Transatlantic Australasian RPS Working Group
Author
Swallow, Carol JStrauss, Dirk C
Bonvalot, Sylvie
Rutkowski, Piotr
Desai, Anant
Gladdy, Rebecca A
Gonzalez, Ricardo
Gyorki, David E
Fairweather, Mark
van Houdt, Winan J
Stoeckle, Eberhard
Park, Jae Berm
Albertsmeier, Markus
Nessim, Carolyn
Cardona, Kenneth
Fiore, Marco
Hayes, Andrew
Tzanis, Dimitri
Skoczylas, Jacek
Ford, Samuel J
Ng, Deanna
Mullinax, John E
Snow, Hayden
Haas, Rick L
Callegaro, Dario
Smith, Myles J
Bouhadiba, Toufik
Stacchiotti, Silvia
Jones, Robin L
DeLaney, Thomas
Roland, Christina L
Raut, Chandrajit P
Gronchi, Alessandro
Publication date
2021-04-14
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Background: Retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcomas comprise a heterogeneous group of rare tumors of mesenchymal origin that include several well-defined histologic subtypes. In 2015, the Transatlantic Australasian RPS Working Group (TARPSWG) published consensus recommendations for the best management of primary retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS). Since then, through international collaboration, new evidence and knowledge have been generated, creating the need for an updated consensus document. Methods: The primary aim of this study was to critically evaluate the current evidence and develop an up-to-date consensus document on the approach to these difficult tumors. The resulting document applies to primary RPS that is non-visceral in origin, with exclusion criteria as previously described. The relevant literature was evaluated and an international group of experts consulted to formulate consensus statements regarding the best management of primary RPS. A level of evidence and grade of recommendation were attributed to each new/updated recommendation. Results: Management of primary RPS was considered from diagnosis to follow-up. This rare and complex malignancy is best managed by an experienced multidisciplinary team in a specialized referral center. The best chance of cure is at the time of primary presentation, and an individualized management plan should be made based on the 29 consensus statements included in this article, which were agreed upon by all of the authors. Whenever possible, patients should be enrolled in prospective trials and studies. Conclusions: Ongoing international collaboration is critical to expand upon current knowledge and further improve outcomes of patients with RPS. In addition, prospective data collection and participation in multi-institution trials are strongly encouraged.Citation
Swallow CJ, Strauss DC, Bonvalot S, Rutkowski P, Desai A, Gladdy RA, Gonzalez R, Gyorki DE, Fairweather M, van Houdt WJ, Stoeckle E, Park JB, Albertsmeier M, Nessim C, Cardona K, Fiore M, Hayes A, Tzanis D, Skoczylas J, Ford SJ, Ng D, Mullinax JE, Snow H, Haas RL, Callegaro D, Smith MJ, Bouhadiba T, Stacchiotti S, Jones RL, DeLaney T, Roland CL, Raut CP, Gronchi A; Transatlantic Australasian RPS Working Group (TARPSWG). Management of Primary Retroperitoneal Sarcoma (RPS) in the Adult: An Updated Consensus Approach from the Transatlantic Australasian RPS Working Group. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Nov;28(12):7873-7888. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-09654-z. Epub 2021 Apr 14Type
ArticleAdditional Links
https://link.springer.com/journal/10434PMID
33852100Journal
Annals of Surgical OncologyPublisher
Springerae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1245/s10434-021-09654-z