Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKamran, Umair
dc.contributor.authorKing, Dominic
dc.contributor.authorDosanjh, Amandeep
dc.contributor.authorCoupland, Ben
dc.contributor.authorLeeds, John
dc.contributor.authorNayar, Manu
dc.contributor.authorPatel, Prashant
dc.contributor.authorTrudgill, Nigel
dc.contributor.authorOppong, Kofi W
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-28T10:49:09Z
dc.date.available2024-08-28T10:49:09Z
dc.date.issued2021-11-12
dc.identifier.citationKamran U, King D, Dosanjh A, Coupland B, Leeds J, Nayar M, Patel P, Trudgill N, Oppong KW. Pancreaticobiliary endoscopic ultrasound in England 2007 to 2016: Changing practice and outcomes. Endosc Int Open. 2021 Nov 12;9(11):E1731-E1739. doi: 10.1055/a-1534-2558.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2364-3722
dc.identifier.eissn2196-9736
dc.identifier.doi10.1055/a-1534-2558
dc.identifier.pmid34790537
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14200/5529
dc.description.abstractBackground and study aims  Population-level data on the outcomes of pancreaticobiliary endoscopic ultrasound (PB-EUS) are limited. We examined national PB-EUS and fine-needle aspiration (FNA) activity, its relation to pancreatic cancer therapy, associated mortality and adverse events. Patients and methods  Adults undergoing PB-EUS in England from 2007-2016 were identified in Hospital Episode Statistics. A pancreatic cancer cohort diagnosed within 6 months of PB-EUS were studied separately. Multivariable logistic regression models examined associations with 30-day mortality and therapies for pancreatic cancer. Results  79,269 PB-EUS in 68,908 subjects were identified. Annual numbers increased from 2,874 (28 % FNA) to 12,752 (35 % FNA) from 2007 to 2016. 8,840 subjects (13 %) were diagnosed with pancreatic cancer. Sedation related adverse events were coded in 0.5 % and emergency admission with acute pancreatitis in 0.2 % within 48 hours of PB-EUS. 1.5 % of subjects died within 30 days of PB-EUS. Factors associated with 30-day mortality included increasing age (odds ratio 1.03 [95 % CI 1.03-1.04]); male sex (1.38 [1.24-1.56]); increasing comorbidity (1.49 [1.27-1.74]); EUS-FNA (2.26 [1.98-2.57]); pancreatic cancer (1.39 [1.19-1.62]); increasing deprivation (least deprived quintile 0.76 [0.62-0.93]) and lower provider PB-EUS volume (2.83 [2.15-3.73]). Factors associated with surgical resection in the pancreatic cancer cohort included lower provider PB-EUS volume (0.44 [0.26-0.74]) and the least deprived subjects (1.33 [1.12-1.57]). 33 % of pancreatic cancer subjects who underwent EUS, did not subsequently receive active cancer treatment. Conclusions  Lower provider PB-EUS volume was associated with higher 30-day mortality and reduced rates of both pancreatic cancer surgery and chemotherapy. These results suggest potential issues with case selection in lower-volume EUS providers.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherThiemeen_US
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ejournals/journal/10.1055/s-00025476en_US
dc.rightsThe Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
dc.subjectGastroenterologyen_US
dc.titlePancreaticobiliary endoscopic ultrasound in England 2007 to 2016: Changing practice and outcomesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.source.journaltitleEndoscopy International Openen_US
dc.source.volume9
dc.source.issue11
dc.source.beginpageE1731
dc.source.endpageE1739
dc.source.countryGermany
rioxxterms.versionNAen_US
dc.contributor.trustauthorDosanjh, Amandeep
dc.contributor.trustauthorCoupland, Ben
dc.contributor.departmentNeurologyen_US
dc.contributor.departmentResearch and Developmenten_US
dc.contributor.roleAdmin and Clericalen_US
dc.contributor.roleNursing and Midwifery Registereden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust; Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust; Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust; Newcastle Universityen_US
oa.grant.openaccessnaen_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record