Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorChen, Zehong
dc.contributor.authorZhu, Yinan
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Wei
dc.contributor.authorEltagy, Hassan
dc.contributor.authorelerian, sherif
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-02T12:40:28Z
dc.date.available2024-09-02T12:40:28Z
dc.date.issued2021-09-14
dc.identifier.citationChen, Z., Zhu, Y., Zhang, W., Eltagy, H., & Elerian, S. (2021). Comparison of Intramedullary Nail and Volar Locking Plate for Distal Radius Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials. Cureus, 13(9), e17972.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2168-8184
dc.identifier.doi10.7759/cureus.17972
dc.identifier.pmid34667661
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14200/5612
dc.description.abstractOperative intervention with a volar locking plate (VLP) is currently the gold standard for the fixation of distal radius fractures. Intramedullary nailing (IMN) of the distal radius is a novel technique that aims to reduce soft tissue complications due to a smaller surgical incision while maintaining the benefits of a rigid fracture fixation. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the functional, clinical, and radiological outcomes of all published randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing patient outcomes of VLP and IMN in distal radius fracture fixation. Three databases (Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library) were searched in July 2021. The inclusion criteria were RCTs comparing fixation of extra-articular or simple intra-articular distal radius with VLP or IMN and availability of full text in English. Children under the age of 18 were excluded. Seven trials with a total of 398 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The meta-analysis showed that there were improved short-term clinical outcomes favouring IMN, although there were no significant differences in terms of functional, radiological, and long-term clinical outcomes. Analysis showed that outcomes of IMN are comparable with VLP for fixation of extra-articular and simple intra-articular distal radius fractures. However, these results should be interpreted with caution due to the small sample size. We recommend that further high-quality trials are required to establish the role of IMN in distal radius fixation.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.subjectOrthopaedicsen_US
dc.titleComparison of Intramedullary Nail and Volar Locking Plate for Distal Radius Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.typeOtheren_US
dc.source.journaltitleCureusen_US
rioxxterms.versionNAen_US
dc.contributor.trustauthorChen, Zehong
dc.contributor.trustauthorEltagy, Hassan
dc.contributor.departmentTrauma and Orthopedic Surgery Departmenten_US
dc.contributor.roleMedical and Dentalen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity College Hospital; Tan Tock Seng Hospital; Sandwell and West Birmingham NHS Trusten_US
dc.identifier.journalCureus
oa.grant.openaccessnaen_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record