Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWest, N P
dc.contributor.authorMansoor, W
dc.contributor.authorTaniere, P
dc.contributor.authorSmyth, E
dc.contributor.authorRodriguez-Justo, M
dc.contributor.authorOniscu, A
dc.contributor.authorCarter, P
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-02T12:56:51Z
dc.date.available2024-09-02T12:56:51Z
dc.date.issued2024-08-08
dc.identifier.citationWest NP, Mansoor W, Taniere P, Smyth E, Rodriguez-Justo M, Oniscu A, Carter P. Best-Practice Biomarker Testing of Oesophago-Gastric Cancer in the UK: Expert Consensus Recommendations Developed Using a Modified Delphi. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2024 Nov;36(11):701-709. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2024.08.002. Epub 2024 Aug 8.en_US
dc.identifier.eissn1433-2981
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.clon.2024.08.002
dc.identifier.pmid39183086
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14200/5616
dc.description.abstractAims: Oesophago-gastric cancers (OGCs) are amongst the most commonly diagnosed malignancies worldwide and are associated with high disease-related mortality. Predictive biomarkers are molecules that can be objectively measured and used to indicate a likely response to therapeutic intervention, thus facilitating individualised cancer therapy. However, there remains variation in uptake and implementation of biomarker testing across the UK. Materials and methods: We conducted a modified Delphi study to formulate consensus recommendations for best-practice biomarker testing of OGC in the UK. We employed two rounds of online questionnaires followed by a virtual consensus meeting. Biomarkers for discussion included HER2, MSI/MMR, and PD-L1. Topics comprised the overall biomarker pathway, pre-analytical, analytical, and post-analytical considerations, including challenges in current practice. Results: Twenty-six and eighteen participants completed the first and second round Delphi questionnaire, respectively, with an even split of pathologists and oncologists from across the UK. There was consensus (>80% agreement) across several topics, including the requirements for standardisation of the pathway, which must include coordination throughout the tissue journey, requirements for a quality-assured process to ensure accuracy and validity of testing, plus the need for clear, detailed information on the pathology report to support treatment decisions. There was consensus amongst oncologists regarding reflex testing of all biomarkers depending on histology; however, concerns over capacity in relation to workload and availability of pathologists were evident among the pathologists. Overall, participants were in the opinion that reflex testing improves the speed of treatment decisions and improves patient care. Conclusion: The recommendations reflect best-practices and should be implemented to support rapid multidisciplinary team decision-making within oesophago-gastric cancer. Results reflect the need for standardisation and demonstrate the challenges faced in clinical practice by those requesting and testing biomarkers for oesophago-gastric cancer, suggesting significant concerns relating to pathologist capacity. Keywords: Consensus recommendations; HER2; MSI/MMR; PD-L1; oesophago-gastric cancer; pathology.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsCopyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
dc.subjectOncology. Pathology.en_US
dc.subjectGastroenterologyen_US
dc.titleBest-Practice Biomarker Testing of Oesophago-Gastric Cancer in the UK: Expert Consensus Recommendations Developed Using a Modified Delphi.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.source.journaltitleClinical Oncologyen_US
dc.source.countryEngland
rioxxterms.versionNAen_US
dc.contributor.trustauthorTaniere, P
oa.grant.openaccessnaen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Publisher version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record