Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMcIntosh, Emma
dc.contributor.authorKent, Seamus
dc.contributor.authorGray, Alastair
dc.contributor.authorClarke, Carl
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, Adrian
dc.contributor.authorJenkinson, Crispin
dc.contributor.authorIves, Natalie
dc.contributor.authorPatel, Smitaa
dc.contributor.authorRick, Caroline
dc.contributor.authorWheatley, Keith
dc.contributor.authorGray, Richard
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-05T09:28:27Z
dc.date.available2024-09-05T09:28:27Z
dc.date.issued2021-05-07
dc.identifier.citationMcIntosh E, Kent S, Gray A, Clarke CE, Williams A, Jenkinson C, Ives N, Patel S, Rick C, Wheatley K, Gray R; PD MED Collaborative Group. Cost-Effectiveness of Dopamine Agonists and Monoamine Oxidase B Inhibitors in Early Parkinson's Disease. Mov Disord. 2021 Sep;36(9):2136-2143.en_US
dc.identifier.eissn1531-8257
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/mds.28623
dc.identifier.pmid33960511
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14200/5642
dc.description.abstractBackground: The PD MED study reported small but persistent benefits in patient-rated mobility scores and quality of life from initiating therapy with levodopa compared with levodopa-sparing therapies in early Parkinson's disease (PD). Objectives: The objective was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of levodopa-sparing therapy (dopamine agonists or monoamine oxidase type B inhibitors compared with levodopa alone. Methods: PD MED is a pragmatic, open-label randomized, controlled trial in which patients newly diagnosed with PD were randomly assigned between levodopa-sparing therapy (dopamine agonists or monoamine oxidase type B inhibitors ) and levodopa alone. Mean quality-adjusted life-years and costs were calculated for each participant. Differences in mean quality-adjusted life-years and costs between levodopa and levodopa-sparing therapies and between dopamine agonists and monoamine oxidase type B inhibitors were estimated using linear regression. Results: Over a mean observation period of 4 years, levodopa was associated with significantly higher quality-adjusted life-years (difference, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.05-0.30; P < 0.01) and lower mean costs (£3390; £2671-£4109; P < 0.01) than levodopa-sparing therapies, the difference in costs driven by the higher costs of levodopa-sparing therapies. There were no significant differences in the costs of inpatient, social care, and institutional care between arms. There was no significant difference in quality-adjusted life-years between those allocated dopamine agonists and monoamine oxidase type B inhibitors (0.02; -0.17 to 0.13 in favor of dopamine agonists; P = 0.81); however costs were significantly lower for those allocated monoamine oxidase type B inhibitors (£2321; £1628-£3015; P < 0.01) because of the higher costs of dopamine agonists. There were no significant differences between arms for other costs. Conclusions: Initial treatment with levodopa is highly cost-effective compared with levodopa-sparing therapies. Monoamine oxidase type B inhibitors, as initial levodopa-sparing therapy was more cost-effective, with similar quality-adjusted life-years but lower costs than dopamine agonists. © 2021 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.subjectNeurologyen_US
dc.titleCost-Effectiveness of Dopamine Agonists and Monoamine Oxidase B Inhibitors in Early Parkinson's Disease.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.typeOtheren_US
dc.source.journaltitleMovement Disordersen_US
rioxxterms.versionNAen_US
dc.contributor.trustauthorClarke, Carl E.
dc.contributor.departmentNeurologyen_US
dc.contributor.roleMedical and Dentalen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Glasgow; University of Oxford; University of Birmingham; Sandwell and West Birmingham NHS Trusten_US
dc.identifier.journalMovement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society
oa.grant.openaccessnaen_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record