Risk factors related to driving : a review of clinical practice evaluating and addressing fitness to drive among psychiatric inpatients
Abstract
Aims: Mental illness is linked with a higher risk of dangerous driving; e.g. patients with neurotic disorders have 50% more accidents than controls and 10% of drivers involved in accidents have reported feeling suicidal. The Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency (DVLA) have provided guidance related to fitness to drive for those with mental illness. In this context we intended to study the risk factors associated with psychiatric inpatients related to driving and whether concerns have been documented in clinical reviews. Methods: Case notes of 100 randomly selected psychiatric inpatients in one calendar month were evaluated including: their driving status; concerns regarding driving based on their clinical status (Diagnosis, Medications, Side effects); any clinical advice given and communication with DVLA in the previous one year, were ascertained from electronic records. Missing values were not included in calculation. Results: The sample consisted of 51 female and 49 male patients (mean age 39.7±13.5 and 39.1±12.7 respectively), with the majority 69% from Caucasian ethnicity; 64% were informal. There was no difference noted in driving status based on ethnicity or legal status on admission. On admission 33% of patients reported that they were not driving, 12% were driving, 2% refused to answer and in more than half (53%) driving status was not documented. Considering some of the risk factors for driving, persistent alcohol use was noted in 39.8%, drug use in 34.4%, personality disorder 37%, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder or autistic spectrum disorder in 4%, being on medications with side effects that may impair driving 80.8%, having side effects that impair driving 10%, and suicidality 54.5%. Only in a minority of cases were fitness to drive related issues discussed in their last review (3%), in progress notes (1%), or in discharge notes (2%). There was no documentation related to communication with the DVLA for any patients. Conclusion: The results suggest there is a need to record the driving status of psychiatric inpatients and to discuss driving related concerns when considering mental state, medications and side effects. Information related to driving should be given to patients, and DVLA should be notified as appropriate. This might help in improving safety related to driving by psychiatric patients.Citation
Fraser A, Chandra P, Sundhar R, Kar N. Risk Factors Related to Driving: A Review of Clinical Practice Evaluating and Addressing Fitness to Drive Among Psychiatric Inpatients. BJPsych Open. 2023;9(S1):S157-S157. doi:10.1192/bjo.2023.420Type
ArticleJournal
BJPsych OpenPublisher
CambridgeCollections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Role of the Guidelines Evidence Specialist in the streamlining of Guidelines at a large acute NHS TrustHeer, Mandeep; Heer, Mandeep; Heer, Mandeep; CEBIS; CEBIS (University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, 2023-11)Role of the Guidelines Evidence Specialist in the streamlining of Guidelines at a large acute NHS Trust
-
Enhancing wellbeing in medical practice: Exploring interventions and effectiveness for improving the work lives of resident (junior) doctors: A systematic review and narrative synthesis.Hirayama, Yuri; Khan, Sunera; Gill, Charn; Thoburn, Maxwell; Hancox, Jennifer; Muzaffar, Jameel; Hiriyama, Yuri; Khan, Sunera; Gill, Charn; Hancox, Jennifer; et al. (Elsevier Ltd, 2024-10-16)Introduction: Globally, resident doctors face challenges like long work hours, critical decision-making stress, and exposure to death and distress, prompting concern for their wellbeing. This study addresses the need for interventions to improve their working conditions, vital for enhancing quality of life, patient care and retaining a skilled workforce. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic literature review until 3 January 2024 explored interventions for resident Ddoctors pre- and post-COVID-19. It evaluated intervention effectiveness, metrics and feasibility, excluding studies with high bias risk. Results: The review identified diverse interventions, from mentoring to wellness resources, showing significant improvements in job satisfaction, mental health and professional growth among resident doctors. Due to methodological variations, a narrative synthesis was conducted. Conclusion: Effective interventions addressing resident doctors' challenges can notably enhance their wellbeing and job satisfaction. Scaling such interventions is vital for fostering supportive work environments, sustaining the healthcare workforce and improving patient care quality.
-
Faculty development: clinical dermatology for medical secretaries and administrative staffAgrawal, Rishi; Browne, Rachel; Baldwin, Nicola; Scott, H.; Tso, Simon; Agrawal, R.; Browne, R.; Baldwin, N.; Scott, H.; Tso, S.; et al. (Oxford University Press, 2020-06)A study investigating the potential benefits of specialty-specific clinical inductions for medical secretaries and administrative staff.