Patient-reported outcomes for nipple reconstruction: Review of literature
Name:
Publisher version
View Source
Access full-text PDFOpen Access
View Source
Check access options
Check access options
Affiliation
Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation TrustPublication date
2021-01-08
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Background: There is currently no validated patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) that is specific to nipple-areola complex (NAC) reconstruction. This paper evaluates all patient-reported outcomes for NAC reconstruction in the literature. Methods: Systematic literature searches of The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE and World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform were conducted to identify all primary studies with patient-reported outcomes for NAC reconstruction. The primary outcome measures were patient satisfaction rates for appearance and symmetry of NAC reconstruction. Results: Fifty-nine papers were included in this review. Reported patient satisfaction was generally high, with the pooled average satisfaction rate for appearance being 81.9% and symmetry 80.3%. 89.5% of respondents would do it again and 94.8% would recommend it to others. There is no standardised or validated PROM specific to NAC reconstruction and this contributes to a lack of conclusive findings from studies in this area. Conclusion: There is a need for a validated PROM that is specific to NAC reconstruction, in order to serve as a standardised outcome assessment to guide further research and improve patient care.Citation
Tan YY, Chin YR, Bajaj K, Thomas S. Patient-reported outcomes for nipple reconstruction: Review of literature. Surgeon. 2021 Oct;19(5):e245-e255. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2020.11.005. Epub 2021 Jan 8.Type
ArticlePMID
33423920Journal
The SurgeonPublisher
Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburghae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.surge.2020.11.005