Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLex, Johnathan R
dc.contributor.authorKurisunkal, Vineet
dc.contributor.authorKaneuchi, Yoichi
dc.contributor.authorFujiwara, Tomohiro
dc.contributor.authorSherriff, Jenny
dc.contributor.authorWigley, Catrin
dc.contributor.authorStevenson, Jonathan D
dc.contributor.authorParry, Michael C
dc.contributor.authorJeys, Lee M
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-09T08:37:38Z
dc.date.available2024-09-09T08:37:38Z
dc.date.issued2021-05-18
dc.identifier.citationLex JR, Kurisunkal V, Kaneuchi Y, Fujiwara T, Sherriff J, Wigley C, Stevenson JD, Parry MC, Jeys LM. Pelvic Ewing sarcoma: Should all patients receive pre-operative radiotherapy, or should it be delivered selectively? Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021 Oct;47(10):2618-2626. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.05.027. Epub 2021 May 18en_US
dc.identifier.issn0748-7983
dc.identifier.eissn1532-2157
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ejso.2021.05.027
dc.identifier.pmid34030919
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14200/5672
dc.description.abstractBackground: Locally recurrent disease following surgical resection of Ewing sarcoma (ES) confers a poor prognosis. Limited evidence is available evaluating non-selective use of pre-operative radiotherapy (RT) for patients with pelvic ES and its effect on local control and survival. Patients and methods: 49 consecutive patients with pelvic ES were identified retrospectively from a prospectively collated database. Patients either received non-selective pre-operative RT and surgery (n = 27), or selective post-operative RT (n = 22) (surgery alone (n = 11) or surgery and post-operative RT (n = 11)). Results: Patients who had non-selective pre-operative radiotherapy appeared to have a higher LRFS, 88.0% compared to 66.5% in the selective RT group (p = 0.096, Kaplan Meier; p = 0.028, Chi-squared). Administration of non-selective, pre-operative RT to all patients with pelvic ES elevates the LFRS to that of the good responder group (≥90% tumour necrosis and margins, p = 0.880). There was no difference in metastasis-free survival, 60.0% and 54.5% (p = 0.728) and overall survival (OS), 57.7% and 63.6% (p = 0.893). The majority of pre-operative RT patients had both good necrosis (≥90%) (p = 0.003) and widely excised tumours, 81.5% vs 59.1% (p = 0.080). Tumour volume ≥250 ml was associated with worse LRFS (p = 0.045) and post-operative complications (p = 0.017). There may be improved LRFS (p = 0.057) with pre-operative proton-beam RT compared to surgery and selective post-operative RT. Conclusion: Pre-operative photon or proton-beam RT to all pelvic ES may improve LRFS compared to the selective delivery of post-operative RT. Radiotherapy delivered to all patients results in a greater percentage of highly necrotic tumours at surgical excision, enabling a greater proportion of patients with wide resection margins.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsCrown Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
dc.subjectOncology. Pathology.en_US
dc.subjectOrthopaedicsen_US
dc.subjectSurgeryen_US
dc.titlePelvic Ewing sarcoma: should all patients receive pre-operative radiotherapy, or should it be delivered selectively?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.source.journaltitleEuropean Journal of Surgical Oncologyen_US
dc.source.volume47
dc.source.issue10
dc.source.beginpage2618
dc.source.endpage2626
dc.source.countryEngland
rioxxterms.versionNAen_US
dc.contributor.trustauthorSherriff, Jenny
dc.contributor.departmentOncologyen_US
dc.contributor.roleMedical and Dentalen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationThe Royal Orthopaedic Hospital; University of Toronto; University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust; Aston Universityen_US
oa.grant.openaccessnaen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Publisher version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record