Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRobertson, A G N
dc.contributor.authorWiggins, T
dc.contributor.authorRobertson, F P
dc.contributor.authorHuppler, L
dc.contributor.authorDoleman, B
dc.contributor.authorHarrison, E M
dc.contributor.authorHollyman, M
dc.contributor.authorWelbourn, R
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-09T09:45:11Z
dc.date.available2024-09-09T09:45:11Z
dc.date.issued2021-07-16
dc.identifier.citationRobertson AGN, Wiggins T, Robertson FP, Huppler L, Doleman B, Harrison EM, Hollyman M, Welbourn R. Perioperative mortality in bariatric surgery: meta-analysis. Br J Surg. 2021 Aug 19;108(8):892-897. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znab245.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0007-1323
dc.identifier.eissn1365-2168
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/bjs/znab245
dc.identifier.pmid34297806
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14200/5677
dc.description.abstractBackground: Bariatric surgery is an established treatment for severe obesity; however, fewer than 1 per cent of eligible patients undergo surgery. The perceived risk of surgery may contribute to the low uptake. The aim of this study was to determine perioperative mortality associated with bariatric surgery, comparing different operation types and data sources. Methods: A literature search of Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was conducted to identify studies published between 1 January 2014 and 31 July 2020. Inclusion criteria were studies of at least 1000 patients reporting short-term mortality after bariatric surgery. Data were collected on RCTs. Meta-analysis was performed to establish overall mortality rates across different study types. The primary outcome measure was perioperative mortality. Different operation types were compared, along with study type, in subgroup analyses. The study was registered at PROSPERO (2019: CRD 42019131632). Results: Some 4356 articles were identified and 58 met the inclusion criteria. Data were available on over 3.6 million patients. There were 4707 deaths. Pooled analysis showed an overall mortality rate of 0.08 (95 per cent c.i. 0.06 to 0.10; 95 per cent prediction interval 0 to 0.21) per cent. In subgroup analysis, there was no statistically significant difference between overall, 30-day, 90-day or in-hospital mortality (P = 0.29). There was no significant difference in reported mortality for RCTs, large studies, national databases or registries (P = 0.60). The pooled mortality rates by procedure type in ascending order were: 0.03 per cent for gastric band, 0.05 per cent for sleeve gastrectomy, 0.09 per cent for one-anastomosis gastric bypass, 0.09 per cent for Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, and 0.41 per cent for duodenal switch (P < 0.001 between operations). Conclusion: Bariatric surgery is safe, with low reported perioperative mortality rates.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen_US
dc.publisherBJS Foundationen_US
dc.relation.urlhttps://academic.oup.com/bjsen_US
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Society Ltd. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
dc.subjectSurgeryen_US
dc.titlePerioperative mortality in bariatric surgery: meta-analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.source.journaltitleBritish Journal of Surgeryen_US
dc.source.volume108
dc.source.issue8
dc.source.beginpage892
dc.source.endpage897
dc.source.countryEngland
rioxxterms.versionNAen_US
dc.contributor.trustauthorWiggins, Tom
dc.contributor.departmentUpper Gastrointestinal Surgeryen_US
dc.contributor.roleMedical and Dentalen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationNHS Fife; University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust; Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh; Musgrove Park Hospital; University of Nottingham; The University of Edinburghen_US
oa.grant.openaccessnaen_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record