Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFisher, Benjamin A
dc.contributor.authorVeenith, Tonny
dc.contributor.authorSlade, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorGaskell, Charlotte
dc.contributor.authorRowland, Matthew
dc.contributor.authorWhitehouse, Tony
dc.contributor.authorScriven, James
dc.contributor.authorParekh, Dhruv
dc.contributor.authorBalasubramaniam, Madhu S
dc.contributor.authorCooke, Graham
dc.contributor.authorMorley, Nick
dc.contributor.authorGabriel, Zoe
dc.contributor.authorWise, Matthew P
dc.contributor.authorPorter, Joanna
dc.contributor.authorMcShane, Helen
dc.contributor.authorHo, Ling-Pei
dc.contributor.authorNewsome, Philip N
dc.contributor.authorRowe, Anna
dc.contributor.authorSharpe, Rowena
dc.contributor.authorThickett, David R
dc.contributor.authorBion, Julian
dc.contributor.authorGates, Simon
dc.contributor.authorRichards, Duncan
dc.contributor.authorKearns, Pamela
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-23T14:15:44Z
dc.date.available2024-09-23T14:15:44Z
dc.date.issued2021-12-16
dc.identifier.citationFisher BA, Veenith T, Slade D, Gaskell C, Rowland M, Whitehouse T, Scriven J, Parekh D, Balasubramaniam MS, Cooke G, Morley N, Gabriel Z, Wise MP, Porter J, McShane H, Ho LP, Newsome PN, Rowe A, Sharpe R, Thickett DR, Bion J, Gates S, Richards D, Kearns P; CATALYST investigators. Namilumab or infliximab compared with standard of care in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 (CATALYST): a randomised, multicentre, multi-arm, multistage, open-label, adaptive, phase 2, proof-of-concept trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2022 Mar;10(3):255-266. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00460-4. Epub 2021 Dec 16en_US
dc.identifier.issn2213-2600
dc.identifier.eissn2213-2619
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00460-4
dc.identifier.pmid34922649
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14200/5837
dc.description.abstractBackground: Dysregulated inflammation is associated with poor outcomes in COVID-19. We aimed to assess the efficacy of namilumab (a granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor inhibitor) and infliximab (a tumour necrosis factor inhibitor) in hospitalised patients with COVID-19, to prioritise agents for phase 3 trials. Methods: In this randomised, multicentre, multi-arm, multistage, parallel-group, open-label, adaptive, phase 2, proof-of-concept trial (CATALYST), we recruited patients (aged ≥16 years) admitted to hospital with COVID-19 pneumonia and C-reactive protein (CRP) concentrations of 40 mg/L or greater, at nine hospitals in the UK. Participants were randomly assigned with equal probability to usual care or usual care plus a single intravenous dose of namilumab (150 mg) or infliximab (5 mg/kg). Randomisation was stratified by care location within the hospital (ward vs intensive care unit [ICU]). Patients and investigators were not masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was improvement in inflammation, measured by CRP concentration over time, analysed using Bayesian multilevel models. This trial is now complete and is registered with ISRCTN, 40580903. Findings: Between June 15, 2020, and Feb 18, 2021, we screened 299 patients and 146 were enrolled and randomly assigned to usual care (n=54), namilumab (n=57), or infliximab (n=35). For the primary outcome, 45 patients in the usual care group were compared with 52 in the namilumab group, and 29 in the usual care group were compared with 28 in the infliximab group. The probabilities that the interventions were superior to usual care alone in reducing CRP concentration over time were 97% for namilumab and 15% for infliximab; the point estimates for treatment-time interactions were -0·09 (95% CI -0·19 to 0·00) for namilumab and 0·06 (-0·05 to 0·17) for infliximab. 134 adverse events occurred in 30 (55%) of 55 patients in the namilumab group compared with 145 in 29 (54%) of 54 in the usual care group. 102 adverse events occurred in 20 (69%) of 29 patients in the infliximab group compared with 112 in 17 (50%) of 34 in the usual care group. Death occurred in six (11%) patients in the namilumab group compared with ten (19%) in the usual care group, and in four (14%) in the infliximab group compared with five (15%) in the usual care group. Interpretation: Namilumab, but not infliximab, showed proof-of-concept evidence for reduction in inflammation-as measured by CRP concentration-in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. Namilumab should be prioritised for further investigation in COVID-19. Funding: Medical Research Council.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/22132600en_US
dc.rightsCopyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
dc.subjectOncology. Pathology.en_US
dc.subjectIntensive careen_US
dc.subjectMicrobiology. Immunologyen_US
dc.subjectCommunicable diseasesen_US
dc.subjectHaematologyen_US
dc.titleNamilumab or infliximab compared with standard of care in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 (CATALYST): a randomised, multicentre, multi-arm, multistage, open-label, adaptive, phase 2, proof-of-concept trial.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.source.journaltitleThe Lancet Respiratory Medicineen_US
rioxxterms.versionNAen_US
dc.contributor.trustauthorFisher, Ben
dc.contributor.trustauthorBion, Julian
dc.contributor.trustauthorWhitehouse, Tony
dc.contributor.trustauthorScriven, James
dc.contributor.trustauthorParekh, Dhruv
dc.contributor.trustauthorThickett, David R
dc.contributor.departmentRheumatologyen_US
dc.contributor.departmentFreedom To Speak Up Guardianen_US
dc.contributor.departmentCritical Careen_US
dc.contributor.departmentInfectious Diseasesen_US
dc.contributor.departmentRespiratory Medicineen_US
dc.contributor.roleAdmin and Clericalen_US
dc.contributor.roleMedical and Dentalen_US
oa.grant.openaccessnaen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Publisher version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record