Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKretzmer, L
dc.contributor.authorDamola, A
dc.contributor.authorLibotte, C
dc.contributor.authorApakama, I
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-30T10:13:24Z
dc.date.available2024-09-30T10:13:24Z
dc.date.issued2022-09
dc.identifier.citationKretzmer L, Damola A, Libotte C, Apakama I. 17 Is Group and Saving Before the Modern Transurethral Resection of the Prostate Still Necessary? British Journal of Surgery. 2022 Sep 1;109(Supplement_6):znac269-491. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znac269.491.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0007-1323
dc.identifier.eissn1365-2168
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/bjs/znac269.491
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14200/5961
dc.description.abstractA group and save (G&S) sample is routinely taken preoperatively for patients undergoing a transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). This procedure has become a key endo-urological procedure; however, it can be associated with complications such as bleeding, potentially requiring blood transfusion. The aim of our study was to assess the need for preoperative G&S sampling in all patients undergoing TURP. This study was a retrospective review of all patients who underwent a TURP from January 2009 until December 2019 in one centre. A total of 687 patients were identified during this period. Data was collected on G&S samples, blood products and post-operative complications such as clot retention or if patients required a blood transfusion. All patients had G&S samples taken prior to their operation, of these, only six (0.87%) patients required a blood transfusion. Half were transfused intra-operatively and half post-operatively. Remarkably, none of the transfused patients were below the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) threshold to transfuse of <70g/dl(8). Six patients were also noted to develop clot retention following removal of catheter. This study has determined that patients undergoing a TURP rarely require blood transfusions. We propose that the practice of routinely taking G&S samples prior to this procedure should be reviewed. This would give a financial benefit and relieve patients of an unnecessary test. We would recommend thorough optimisation of patients prior to surgery including review of anticoagulation and correction of any pre-operative anaemia.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen_US
dc.subjectUrologyen_US
dc.subjectSurgeryen_US
dc.titleIs group and saving before the modern transurethral resection of the prostate still necessary?en_US
dc.typeConference Outputen_US
dc.source.journaltitleBritish Journal of Surgeryen_US
rioxxterms.versionNAen_US
dc.contributor.trustauthorKretzmer, L.
dc.contributor.trustauthorDamola, A.
dc.contributor.trustauthorLibotte, C.
dc.contributor.trustauthorApakama, I.
dc.contributor.departmentUrologyen_US
dc.contributor.roleMedical and Dentalen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationGeorge Eliot Hospital NHS Trust, Nuneatonen_US
oa.grant.openaccessnaen_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record