Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorYamanouchi, Liana
dc.contributor.authorSrinivasan, Maheshwari
dc.contributor.authorBarlow, Nicola
dc.contributor.authorBasu, Ansu
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-03T11:32:13Z
dc.date.available2024-10-03T11:32:13Z
dc.date.issued2021-09-15
dc.identifier.citationYamanouchi L, Srinivasan M, Barlow N, Basu A. Level of adherence to vitamin D supplementation guidelines in an antenatal centre in Birmingham, UK, and its effect on biochemical and obstetrical outcomes: a single-centre cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2021 Sep 15;11(9):e048705.en_US
dc.identifier.eissn2044-6055
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjopen-2021-048705
dc.identifier.pmid34526340
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14200/6022
dc.description.abstractObjectives: A third of pregnant women in the UK are vitamin D deficient, which may confer deleterious consequences, including an increased risk of pre-eclampsia, gestational diabetes mellitus and intrauterine growth restriction. This study aims to determine the proportion of women that met National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) standards for vitamin D supplementation in pregnancy and compare biochemical and obstetrical outcomes according to supplementation status. Design and setting: This is a single-centre cross-sectional study in an antenatal centre in Birmingham, UK. Participants received a questionnaire regarding their experiences with vitamin D supplementation during their pregnancy with their general practitioner. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and bone profile results were obtained during the same appointment and obstetrical outcomes were collected retrospectively once participants had delivered. Results: 41.8% of participants (n=61) received written and/or verbal advice about supplementation, (NICE standards=100%). 72.6% (n=106) had one or more risk factors for vitamin D deficiency, of which 38.7% (n=41, NICE standards=100%) were asked about supplementation. Among those asked, 85.4% (n=41, NICE standards=100%) received the correct dosage. Compared with the supplementation group, the non-supplementation group had offspring that were 1.40 cm (95% CI 0.01 to 2.80, p=0.04) longer at birth; which was significant after adjusting for confounding factors. No significant differences in any biochemical parameters were observed between supplementation categories (p>0.05). Conclusions: Adherence to NICE standards was suboptimal. This may be attributed to insufficient training for general practitioners on the importance of supplementation, causing them to underestimate the consequences of gestational vitamin D deficiency. Recommendations include implementing a mandatory screening tool to identify 'at-risk' women and providing more clinician training to ensure that supplementation during pregnancy is standard of care.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Groupen_US
dc.subjectEndocrinologyen_US
dc.titleLevel of adherence to vitamin D supplementation guidelines in an antenatal centre in Birmingham, UK, and its effect on biochemical and obstetrical outcomes: a single-centre cross-sectional study.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.source.journaltitleBMJ Openen_US
rioxxterms.versionNAen_US
dc.contributor.trustauthorYamanouchi, Liana
dc.contributor.trustauthorSrinivasan, Maheshwari
dc.contributor.trustauthorBarlow, Nicola
dc.contributor.trustauthorbasu, Ansu
dc.contributor.departmentDiabetes and Endocrinologyen_US
dc.contributor.departmentBlack Country Pathology Servicesen_US
dc.contributor.departmentObstetrics and Gynaecologyen_US
dc.contributor.roleMedical and Dentalen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationEast Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust; Black Country Pathology Services; Sandwell and West Birmingham NHS Trusten_US
dc.identifier.journalBMJ open
oa.grant.openaccessnaen_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record