RSS 1.0Anaesthetics
Recent Submissions
-
Efficacy and safety of sublingual buprenorphine in managing acute postoperative pain - a systematic reviewSublingual (SL) buprenorphine has been used as a modality of managing acute postoperative pain in many studies. This systematic review aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of SL buprenorphine as an analgesic for various surgeries. After registering the protocol with PROSPERO, we searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Ovid databases with relevant keywords. The primary outcomes were 24-hour pain scores, and the secondary outcomes were postoperative nausea and vomiting, sedation scores, pruritus, rescue analgesia, and urinary retention. The risk of bias scale was used to identify the quality of evidence. From the 103 articles identified, four randomized-controlled trials fulfilled the inclusion criteria for qualitative analysis. The overall risk of bias was low. Most of the studies showed that the use of SL buprenorphine led to either better or comparable pain scores when compared to a control group with lesser or tolerable adverse events. There was a lot of heterogeneity across the studies in this systematic review in terms of the type of surgery performed, the comparison groups, doses of buprenorphine, and the outcomes that were assessed. Therefore, a quantitative meta-analysis was not performed. The results of this systematic review should be interpreted with caution due to heterogeneity in the methodology. Adequately powered studies with robust methodology should investigate the safety and efficacy of SL buprenorphine when used for postoperative analgesia.
-
Evaluation of National Anaesthetics Teaching in Undergraduate Medicine (ENATUM)Background: During a global pandemic where anaesthetists play a pertinent role in treating coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19), it is crucial to inspire medical students to consider a career in anaesthetics and perioperative care. Where anaesthetic skills are vital for all surgical foundation doctors, regardless of whether they have a rotation in anaesthetics, this study seeks to establish the current level of exposure to anaesthetics in the UK medical schools' curriculum and evaluate if the current anaesthetic undergraduate curriculum is sufficient to prepare students to pass their exams and perform the duties expected of them as future junior doctors. Methods: A 35-item structured questionnaire, registered at University College London Hospital Research & Development (R&D), was distributed amongst foundation doctors who had graduated from UK universities within the previous 3 years between August and October 2020. Results: In total, 239 participants completed the questionnaire from 34 UK medical schools. Despite 90.0% of participants being allocated an 'anaesthesia' placement, 54.0% spent <15 hours shadowing an anaesthetist throughout their medical school. Of participants, 38.5% agreed that their anaesthetic teaching was sufficient compared to teaching of other specialities, with 48.6% of students not satisfied with the teaching provided to meet anaesthetic learning outcomes set by The Royal College of Surgeons of England; 72.4% said they would have benefited from additional anaesthetic teaching, with 80.7% stating it would have increased understanding into the speciality; and 71.5% stated a short course in anaesthetics alongside undergraduate training would have been beneficial. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that there is a lack of standardization in undergraduate anaesthetics teaching nationally and an additional undergraduate anaesthetic teaching programme is required to increase understanding and provide further insight into anaesthetics. Key messages: The emergence of the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has halted undergraduate medical education, in particular perioperative medicine and surgery.Exposure to anaesthesia is already limited in the medical undergraduate curriculum, with a limited number of anaesthesia-themed foundation rotations available for junior doctors.Recent UK graduates feel that undergraduate anaesthetics education is inadequate at medical school, reporting a lack of confidence in applying undergraduate anaesthesia learning outcomes.Additional anaesthetic teaching and online teaching methods are suggested ways of improving the delivery of undergraduate anaesthetic education.Can a national, standardized anaesthetics teaching curriculum improve the undergraduate knowledge base of anaesthesia?
-
Efficacy of intravenous nalbuphine for managing post-anaesthesia shivering : a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials with trial sequential analysisBackground and aims: Post-anaesthesia shivering is distressing and is observed after spinal and general anaesthesia. Nalbuphine, a partial mu-opioid receptor antagonist with kappa-opioid receptor agonist properties, has been successfully used to manage post-anaesthesia shivering. Methods: After registering the review with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO), we searched PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Ovid, Cochrane Library and clinicaltrials.gov with keywords for randomised controlled trials. The risk of bias-2 (RoB-2) scale was used to assess the quality of evidence. We also used Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) guidelines to evaluate the strength of evidence and trial sequential analysis to validate the conclusions. Results: Of the 240 articles, 10 were considered eligible for review (700 patients, 350- nalbuphine, 350- control or placebo). When compared to placebo, the success rate of nalbuphine controlling shivering was significantly better (risk ratio [RR]: 2.37, 95% confidence interval [CI]:1.91, 2.94; P = 0.04, I² = 94%), but comparable to the control group drugs (opioids, dexmedetomidine, ondansetron, pethidine). Compared to placebo, shivering recurrence was significantly less with nalbuphine than with placebo (RR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.26, 0.83; P = 0.01, I² = 61%), but comparable with the control group. The incidence of postoperative nausea/vomiting (PONV) was significantly less with nalbuphine when compared to the control group (RR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.47, 0.95; P = 0.02, I² = 37%), but PONV in the nalbuphine group was comparable to placebo (RR: 1.20, 95% CI: 0.68, 2.12; P = 0.54, I² = 0%). Other outcomes, like the grade of shivering and hypotension, were comparable between the nalbuphine and control groups. Conclusion: Nalbuphine successfully controls post-anaesthesia shivering and reduces the recurrence of shivering.
-
Analgesic efficacy and outcomes of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block in patients undergoing bariatric and metabolic surgeries : a systematic reviewErector spinae plane block (ESPB) has been used as an intervention for providing postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing bariatric and metabolic surgeries. After registering the protocol in PROSPERO, randomized controlled trials and nonrandomized observational studies were searched in various databases till July 2022. The primary outcome was 24-h opioid consumption; the secondary outcomes were intraoperative opioid use, pain scores, time to rescue analgesia, and complications. The risk of bias and Newcastle-Ottawa scale were used to assess the quality of evidence. From the 695 studies identified, 6 studies were selected for analysis. The 24-h opioid consumption was significantly lesser in ESPB group when compared to control (mean difference [MD]: -10.67; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -21.03, -0.31, I² = 99%). The intraoperative opioid consumption was significantly less in the ESPB group (MD: -17.75; 95% CI: -20.36, -15.13, I² = 31%). The time to rescue analgesia was significantly more in the ESPB group (MD: 114.36; CI: 90.42, 138.30, I² = 99%). Although pain scores were significantly less at 6 and 24 h in ESPB group (MD: -2.00, 95% CI: -2.49, -1.51; I² = 0% and MD: -0.48; 95% CI: -0.72, -0.24; I² = 48%), at zero and 12 h, the pain scores were comparable (MD: -1.53, 95% CI: -3.06, -0.00, I² = 97% and MD: -0.80; 95% CI: -1.80, 0.20, I² = 88%). Bilateral ESPB provides opioid-sparing analgesia and better pain scores when compared to control. These results should be interpreted with caution due to high heterogeneity among the included studies.
-
Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) as an alternative for celiac plexus blocks : expanding ESPB indications for mesenteric ischemia reliefMesenteric ischemia is a severe condition associated with abdominal pain which often requires multimodal analgesia, including opioids or sympathetic blocks such as celiac plexus blocks. The erector spinae plane (ESPB) has emerged as a potentially effective alternative for managing pain in various surgical and non-surgical conditions. This case report explores the use of ultrasound-guided ESPB as a novel approach to pain management in a patient with acute on chronic mesenteric ischemia. A 70-year-old male with a history of mesenteric ischemia and multiple comorbidities presented with worsening diffuse abdominal pain. Despite medical and surgical treatment, the patient required a high dose of opioids for pain control. Bilateral ESPBs with continuous infusions were performed at the T6 level under ultrasound guidance. The patient reported immediate and complete relief from abdominal pain following the block, with a significant drop in the pain score. The use of opioids was significantly reduced. This case report demonstrates the potential benefits of ultrasound-guided ESPB as an alternative to traditional pain management techniques in patients with mesenteric ischemia. ESPB may provide safe, simple, and effective analgesia, reducing the need for high-dose opioids and their associated side effects. Further studies are warranted to validate these findings and explore the broader application of ESPB in the management of mesenteric ischemia pain.
-
Ultrasound-guided transversalis fascia plane block for postoperative analgesia : a systematic review and meta-analysisUltrasound-guided transversalis fascia plane block (TFPB) has been used for providing postoperative analgesia after various lower abdominal surgeries like iliac crest bone harvesting, inguinal hernia repair, caesarean section and appendicectomy. After registering the protocol in PROSPERO, various databases like PubMed/Medline, Ovid, CENTRAL and clinicaltrials.gov were searched for randomized controlled trials and observational, comparative studies till October 2022. The risk of bias (RoB-2) scale was used to assess the quality of evidence. The database searched identified 149 articles. Out of these, 8 studies were identified for qualitative analysis and 3 studies were TFPB was compared to control in patients undergoing caesarean section were selected for quantitative analysis. At 12 hours, pain scores were significantly less in TFPB group when compared to control on movement with no heterogeneity. At other times, the pain scores were comparable. 24-hr opioid consumption was significantly less in TFPB group when compared to control with significant heterogeneity. Time to rescue analgesia was significantly less in TFPB group when compared to control with significant heterogeneity. Number of patients requiring rescue analgesia were significantly less in TFPB group when compared to control with no heterogeneity. Postoperative nausea/vomiting (PONV) was significantly less in TFPB group when compared to control with minimal heterogeneity. In conclusion, TFPB is a safe block which provides opioid-sparing postoperative analgesia and a delayed time to rescue analgesia with no significant difference in pain scores and lesser PONV postoperatively when compared to control in patients undergoing caesarean section.
-
Efficacy and safety of oral tizanidine premedication as pre-emptive analgesia in adult patients undergoing elective surgeries. A systematic reviewTizanidine is a centrally acting α2 agonist which has been used as a premedication due to its opioid-sparing and sympatholytic properties. This systematic review assessed the safety and feasibility of oral tizanidine. After registering the protocol with PROSPERO (CRD42022368546), randomized controlled trials and non-randomized observational studies were searched in various databases. The primary outcome was intraoperative opioid use; the secondary outcomes were 24-hr opioid consumption, pain scores, time to rescue analgesia, and adverse events. The risk of bias scale was used to assess the quality of evidence. Out of 202 studies identified, five studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Intraoperative opioid consumption was significantly less in the tizanidine group (MD: -2.40; 95% CI: -4.22, -0.59; P = 0.010; I2 = 0 %). The 24-hr opioid consumption was comparable between both groups (MD: -42.53, 95% CI: -91.45, 6.39; P = 0.09; I2 = 99%). Time to rescue analgesia was comparable between both groups (MD: 308.22; 95% CI: -263.67, 880.11, P = 0.29, I2 = 100%). Pain scores at 6 and 12 hours were comparable (MD: -1.37; 95% CI: -3.68, 0.94; P = 0.24; I2 = 97%) and (MD: -1.76; 95% CI: -4.06, 0.53; P = 0.13; I2 = 95%); however, at 24 hours the scores were better in the tizanidine group (MD: -1.10; 95% CI: -1.50, -0.69; P < 0.0001 I2 = 0%). Although dry mouth was significantly more in the tizanidine group (MD: 5.35; 95% CI: 1.72, 16.62; P = 0.004; I2 = 0%), postoperative nausea/vomiting and dizziness were comparable. Tizanidine reduces intraoperative opioid consumption without significant adverse events. However, it does not provide effective opioid-sparing analgesia or reduced opioid requirement in the first 24 hours after surgery.
-
Application of enhanced recovery after surgery pathways in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy with and without common bile duct exploration : a systematic review and meta-analysisMany researchers have implemented enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways for laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and found it effective over conventional care. This review investigates the efficacy and safety of such pathways compared to conventional practices. PubMed Central/Medline, Scopus, Ovid and clinicaltrials. gov were searched using relevant keywords to identify studies in which ERAS pathways for LC were compared to conventional pathways. The primary outcome was length of stay (LOS) from the day of surgery and the secondary outcomes were pain scores, postoperative nausea/vomiting (PONV), readmissions (within 30 days after surgery), complications (medical and surgical), time to first flatus and cost. Out of 590 articles identified, six studies (n = 1,489 patients) fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were used for qualitative and quantitative analysis. On pooled analysis, LOS, time to first flatus, PONV and pain scores were significantly less in the ERAS group than in the conventional one, while readmission and complications were comparable in both groups.
-
Erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia in cardiac surgeries : a systematic review and meta-analysisUltrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has been used in many studies for providing opioid-sparing analgesia after various cardiac surgeries. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to assess the efficacy of ESPB in cardiac surgeries. We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Google Scholar to identify the studies in which ESPB was compared with the control group/sham block in patients undergoing cardiac surgeries. The primary outcomes were postoperative opioid consumption and postoperative pain scores. The secondary outcomes were intraoperative opioid consumption, ventilation time, time to the first mobilization, length of ICU and hospital stay, and adverse events. Out of 607 studies identified, 16 studies (n = 1110 patients) fulfilled inclusion criteria and were used for qualitative and quantitative analysis. Although, 24-hr opioid consumption were comparable in both groups group (MD, -18.74; 95% CI, -46.85 to 9.36, P = 0.16), the 48-hr opioid consumption was significantly less in ESPB group than control ((MD, -11.01; 95% CI, -19.98 to --2.04, P = 0.02). The pain scores at various time intervals and intraoperative opioid consumption were significantly less in ESPB group. Moreover, duration of ventilation, time to the first mobilization, and length of ICU and hospital were also less in ESPB group (P < 0.00001, P < 0.00001, P < 0.00001, and P < 0.0001, respectively). This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated that ESPB provides opioid-sparing perioperative analgesia, facilitates early extubation and mobilization, leads to early discharge from ICU and hospital, and has lesser pruritus when compared to control in patients undergoing cardiac surgeries.
-
Comparing the Scalpel-Bougie-Tube emergency front-of-neck airway (eFONA) technique on conventional manikins and ovine larynges : evaluating cost, realism and performance in anaesthetic traineesBackground Emergency front-of-neck airway (eFONA) is a crucial life-saving procedure in "cannot intubate, cannot oxygenate" (CICO) situations. It is essential to teach and maintain eFONA skills for healthcare providers, especially anesthesiologists. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of cost-effective ovine larynx models compared to conventional manikins in teaching eFONA using the scalpel-bougie-tube technique to a group of anaesthesia novices and newly appointed anaesthetic Fellows. Methods and study design The study was conducted at Walsall Manor Hospital, a district general hospital in the Midlands, UK. Participants underwent a pre-survey to assess familiarity with FONA and the ability to perform a laryngeal handshake. After a lecture and demonstration, participants performed two consecutive emergency cricothyrotomies on both ovine models and conventional manikins, followed by a post-survey to assess their confidence in performing eFONA and rate their experience using sheep larynges. Results The training session significantly improved the participants' ability to perform a laryngeal handshake and their confidence in performing eFONA. The majority of participants rated the ovine model higher in terms of realism, difficulty with penetration, difficulty in recognising landmarks, and difficulty in performing the procedure. Additionally, the ovine model was more cost-effective compared to conventional manikins. Conclusion Ovine models provide a more realistic and cost-effective alternative to conventional manikins for teaching eFONA using the scalpel-bougie-tube technique. The use of these models in routine airway teaching enhances the practical skill set of anaesthesia novices and newly appointed anaesthetists, better preparing them for CICO situations. However, further training with objective assessment methods and larger samples is needed to corroborate these findings.