Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWinsper, Catherine
dc.contributor.authorBilgin, Ayten
dc.contributor.authorThompson, Andrew
dc.contributor.authorMarwaha, Steven
dc.contributor.authorChanen, Andrew M
dc.contributor.authorSingh, Swaran P
dc.contributor.authorWang, Ariel
dc.contributor.authorFurtado, Vivek
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-10T13:51:09Z
dc.date.available2024-10-10T13:51:09Z
dc.date.issued2020-02
dc.identifier.citationWinsper C, Bilgin A, Thompson A, Marwaha S, Chanen AM, Singh SP, Wang A, Furtado V. The prevalence of personality disorders in the community: a global systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry. 2020 Feb;216(2):69-78. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2019.166. PMID: 31298170.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1192/bjp.2019.166
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14200/6085
dc.description.abstractBackground: Personality disorders are now internationally recognised as a mental health priority. Nevertheless, there are no systematic reviews examining the global prevalence of personality disorders. Aims: To calculate the worldwide prevalence of personality disorders and examine whether rates vary between high-income countries and low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Method: We systematically searched PsycINFO, MEDLINE, EMBASE and PubMed from January 1980 to May 2018 to identify articles reporting personality disorder prevalence rates in community populations (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42017065094). Results: A total of 46 studies (from 21 different countries spanning 6 continents) satisfied inclusion criteria. The worldwide pooled prevalence of any personality disorder was 7.8% (95% CI 6.1-9.5). Rates were greater in high-income countries (9.6%, 95% CI 7.9-11.3%) compared with LMICs (4.3%, 95% CI 2.6-6.1%). In univariate meta-regressions, significant heterogeneity was partly attributable to study design (two-stage v. one-stage assessment), county income (high-income countries v. LMICs) and interview administration (clinician v. trained graduate). In multiple meta-regression analysis, study design remained a significant predictor of heterogeneity. Global rates of cluster A, B and C personality disorders were 3.8% (95% CI 3.2, 4.4%), 2.8% (1.6, 3.7%) and 5.0% (4.2, 5.9%). Conclusions: Personality disorders are prevalent globally. Nevertheless, pooled prevalence rates should be interpreted with caution due to high levels of heterogeneity. More large-scale studies with standardised methodologies are now needed to increase our understanding of population needs and regional variations.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherRoyal College of Psychiatristsen_US
dc.publisherCambridge University Pressen_US
dc.relation.urlhttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31298170/en_US
dc.subjectMental healthen_US
dc.titleThe prevalence of personality disorders in the community: a global systematic review and meta-analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.source.journaltitleBritish Journal of Psychiatryen_US
rioxxterms.versionNAen_US
dc.contributor.trustauthorWinsper, Catherine
dc.contributor.departmentPsychiatryen_US
dc.contributor.roleMedical and Dentalen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Warwick; Coventry and Warwickshire Partnership Trust; Istanbul Medeniyet University; University of Melbourne; Birmingham University; Barberry, National Centre for Mental Health; The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health;en_US
oa.grant.openaccessnaen_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record