Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Recent Submissions
-
The effect of the measures taken during the coronavirus pandemic on specialty trainees in obstetrics and gynaecology in the United Kingdom : an online questionnaire survey in one regionThe coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19) has had unprecedented effects on healthcare delivery. A 34-question online survey was sent to obstetrics and gynaecology trainees within the West Midlands to assess the impact of the pandemic on training, working practices and well-being. 101 responses were received from obstetrics and gynaecology trainees. Trainees reported a significant reduction in both elective and emergency surgeries as well as outpatient clinics. Over one third of respondents felt additional training time may be required following reduction of clinical opportunities. 44% of trainees felt their workload increased significantly. 55% of trainees felt the pandemic had a significant negative impact on their physical and mental well-being. Obstetrics and gynaecology trainees in the West Midlands have adapted to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic despite significant impact on their training, working practices and wellbeing. It is important to tailor training to improve trainees' education and combat lost training time during the pandemic. This should be considered for long-term shaping of the obstetrics and gynaecology training pathway.IMPACT STATEMENTWhat is already known on this subject? Little research is available about the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on obstetrics and gynaecology trainees. This is the first study of its kind to assess the effect of the pandemic on obstetrics ang gynaecology trainees in the United Kingdom.What do the results of this study add? The results of this study have shown that obstetrics and gynaecology training has been heavily affected during the COVID-19 pandemic. There have been significant impacts on their training, working patterns and physical and mental wellbeing.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? These findings can be used to mould the obstetrics and gynaecology training pathway based on the feedback given by the trainees during the pandemic. The survey questions can also be utilised as a framework for similar research projects across the United Kingdom Deaneries, among other specialties and around the world.
-
Anal incontinence following obstetric anal sphincter injury : is there a difference between subtypes? A systematic reviewAims: Obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) is associated with long-term anal incontinence (AI). We aimed to address the following questions: (a) are women with major OASI (grade 3c and 4) at higher risk of developing AI when compared to women with minor OASI (grade 3a and 3b)? (b) is a fourth-degree tear more likely to cause AI over a third-degree tear? Methods: A systematic literature search from inception until September 2022. We considered prospective and retrospective cohort studies, cross-sectional and case-control studies without language restrictions. The quality was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist. Risk ratios (RRs) were calculated to measure the effect of different grades of OASI. Results: Out of 22 studies, 8 were prospective cohort, 8 were retrospective cohort, and 6 were cross-sectional studies. Length of follow-up ranged from 1 month to 23 years, with the majority of the reports (n = 16) analysing data within 12-months postpartum. Third-degree tears evaluated were 6454 versus 764 fourth-degree tears. The risk of bias was low in 3, medium in 14 and high in 5 studies, respectively. Prospective studies showed that major tears are associated with a twofold risk of AI for major tears versus minor tears, while retrospective studies consistently showed a risk of fecal incontinence (FI) which was two- to fourfold higher. Prospective studies showed a trend toward worsening AI symptoms for fourth-degree tears, but this failed to reach statistical significance. Cross-sectional studies with long-term (≥5 years) follow-up showed that women with fourth-degree tear were more likely to develop AI, with an RR ranging from 1.4 to 2.2. Out of 3, 2 retrospective studies showed similar findings, but the follow-up was significantly shorter (≤1 year). Contrasting results were noted for FI rates, as only 5 out of 10 studies supported an association between fourth-degree tear and FI. Conclusions: Most studies investigate bowel symptoms within few months from delivery. Data heterogeneity hindered a meaningful synthesis. Prospective cohort studies with adequate power and long-term follow-up should be performed to evaluate the risk of AI for each OASI subtype.
-
First trimester placental volume and vascular indices in pregestational diabetic compared to nondiabetic pregnant women.Aim: Comparing placental volume (PV) and vascular indices in pregestational diabetic and nondiabetic pregnant women at 11 and 13 weeks gestation. Methods: A case-control study conducted at Ain Shams University Maternity Hospital in collaboration with Feto-maternal Unit for Ultrasound Assessment, Ain Shams University Maternity Hospital, Egypt. Ninety-two pregnant women divided into two groups: Group A included 46 women with pregestational diabetes mellitus and group B included 46 nondiabetic pregnant women as control. All participants had PV, vascularization index (VI), flow index (FI) and vascularization flow index (VFI) calculated using three-dimensional (3D) ultrasonography and 3D power Doppler at 11 and 13 weeks of pregnancy. Results: At 11 weeks, the mean VI, FI and VFI in diabetic group (17.70 ± 12.62, 40.72 ± 11.03 and 7.77 ± 6.37, respectively) were insignificantly higher than in nondiabetic group (12.14 ± 12.62, 34.59 ± 9.66 and 6.52 ± 14.20, respectively) while mean PV in diabetic group (26.90 ± 14.74) was insignificantly lower than in nondiabetic group (27.53 ± 17.46). Also at 13 weeks, the results were not different as the mean VI, FI and VFI in diabetic group (16.51 ± 9.81, 42.52 ± 7.47 and 8.12 ± 7.55, respectively) were insignificantly higher than in nondiabetic group (16.37 ± 14.17, 40.29 ± 17.52 and 7.08 ± 4.35, respectively), and mean PV in diabetic group (52.04 ± 17.95) was insignificantly lower than in nondiabetic group (54.46 ± 17.85). There was strong positive correlation between HbA1C level and VFI measured at 13 weeks gestation. Conclusions: Placental indices in early pregnancy do not seem to be useful markers to anticipate placental pathology in pregestational diabetes, however there might be a role for HbA1C level measurement to anticipate such complications.
-
Analgesia for office hysteroscopy : a systematic review and meta-analysisObjective: To identify the most effective analgesia for women undergoing office hysteroscopy. Data sources: We searched Medline, Embase, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and the Cochrane Library from inception until August 2019 for studies that investigated the effect of different analgesics on pain control in office hysteroscopy. Methods of study selection: We included randomized controlled trials that investigated the effect of analgesics on pain experienced by women undergoing diagnostic or operative hysteroscopy in an office setting compared with the control group. Tabulation, integration, and results: The literature search returned 561 records. Twenty-two studies were selected for a systematic review, of which 16 were suitable for meta-analysis. There was a statistically significant reduction in pain during office hysteroscopy associated with preprocedural administration of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (standardized mean difference [SMD] -0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.27 to -0.16), opioids (SMD -0.50; 95% CI -0.97 to -0.03), and antispasmodics (SMD -1.48; 95% CI -1.82 to -1.13), as well as with the use of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) (SMD -0.99; 95% CI -1.67 to -0.31), compared with the control group. Moreover, similar reduction in pain was observed after office hysteroscopy: NSAIDs (SMD -0.55; 95% CI -0.97 to -0.13), opioids (SMD -0.73; 95% CI -1.07 to -0.39), antispasmodics (SMD -1.02; 95% CI -1.34 to -0.69), and TENS (SMD -0.54; 95% CI -0.95 to -0.12). Significantly reduced pain scores with oral NSAID administration during (SMD -0.87; 95% CI -1.59 to -0.15) and after (SMD -0.56; 95% CI -1.02 to -0.10) office hysteroscopy were seen in contrast to other routes. Significantly more adverse effects were reported with the use of opioids (p <.001) and antispasmodics (p <.001) when compared with the control group, in contrast to NSAIDs (p = .97) and TENS (p = .63). Conclusion: Women without contraindications should be advised to take oral NSAIDs before undergoing office hysteroscopy to reduce pain during and after the procedure. TENS should be considered as an alternative analgesic in women with contraindications to NSAIDs.