• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
    • Trust Wide Services
    • Health Care Services
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
    • Trust Wide Services
    • Health Care Services
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of West Midlands Evidence RepositoryCommunitiesAuthorsTitlesPublication DateSubjectsPublication TypesJournalPublisherThis CollectionAuthorsTitlesPublication DateSubjectsPublication TypesJournalPublisherProfilesView

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    About

    AboutPolicies Privacy NoticeBlack Country Healthcare NHS Foundation TrustCoventry and Warwickshire Partnership NHS TrustDudley Group NHS Foundation TrustGeorge Eliot Hospital NHS TrustSandwell and West Birmingham NHS TrustSouth Warwickshire University NHS Foundation TrustUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation TrustUniversity Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS TrustWalsall Healthcare NHS Trust

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Placebo comparator group selection and use in surgical trials: the ASPIRE project including expert workshop

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Author
    Beard, David J
    Campbell, Marion K
    Blazeby, Jane M
    Carr, Andrew J
    Weijer, Charles
    Cuthbertson, Brian H
    Buchbinder, Rachelle
    Pinkney, Thomas
    Bishop, Felicity L
    Pugh, Jonathan
    Cousins, Sian
    Harris, Ian
    Lohmander, L Stefan
    Blencowe, Natalie
    Gillies, Katie
    Probst, Pascal
    Brennan, Carol
    Cook, Andrew
    Farrar-Hockley, Dair
    Savulescu, Julian
    Huxtable, Richard
    Rangan, Amar
    Tracey, Irene
    Brocklehurst, Peter
    Ferreira, Manuela L
    Nicholl, Jon
    Reeves, Barnaby C
    Hamdy, Freddie
    Rowley, Samuel Cs
    Lee, Naomi
    Cook, Jonathan A
    Show allShow less
    Affiliation
    University of Oxford; University of Aberdeen; University of Bristol; Western University; Monash University; Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham; University of Southampton; University of New South Wales; Lund University; University of Heidelberg; University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust; University of York; John Radcliffe Hospital; University of Birmingham; The University of Sydney; University of Sheffield; University of Bristol; Medical Research Council; The Lancet
    Publication date
    2021-09
    Subject
    Surgery
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Background: The use of placebo comparisons for randomised trials assessing the efficacy of surgical interventions is increasingly being considered. However, a placebo control is a complex type of comparison group in the surgical setting and, although powerful, presents many challenges. Objectives: To provide a summary of knowledge on placebo controls in surgical trials and to summarise any recommendations for designers, evaluators and funders of placebo-controlled surgical trials. Design: To carry out a state-of-the-art workshop and produce a corresponding report involving key stakeholders throughout. Setting: A workshop to discuss and summarise the existing knowledge and to develop the new guidelines. Results: To assess what a placebo control entails and to assess the understanding of this tool in the context of surgery is considered, along with when placebo controls in surgery are acceptable (and when they are desirable). We have considered ethics arguments and regulatory requirements, how a placebo control should be designed, how to identify and mitigate risk for participants in these trials, and how such trials should be carried out and interpreted. The use of placebo controls is justified in randomised controlled trials of surgical interventions provided that there is a strong scientific and ethics rationale. Surgical placebos might be most appropriate when there is poor evidence for the efficacy of the procedure and a justified concern that results of a trial would be associated with a high risk of bias, particularly because of the placebo effect. Conclusions: The use of placebo controls is justified in randomised controlled trials of surgical interventions provided that there is a strong scientific and ethics rationale. Feasibility work is recommended to optimise the design and implementation of randomised controlled trials. An outline for best practice was produced in the form of the Applying Surgical Placebo in Randomised Evaluations (ASPIRE) guidelines for those considering the use of a placebo control in a surgical randomised controlled trial. Limitations: Although the workshop participants involved international members, the majority of participants were from the UK. Therefore, although every attempt was made to make the recommendations applicable to all health systems, the guidelines may, unconsciously, be particularly applicable to clinical practice in the UK NHS. Future work: Future work should evaluate the use of the ASPIRE guidelines in making decisions about the use of a placebo-controlled surgical trial. In addition, further work is required on the appropriate nomenclature to adopt in this space. Funding: Funded by the Medical Research Council UK and the National Institute for Health Research as part of the Medical Research Council-National Institute for Health Research Methodology Research programme.
    Citation
    Beard DJ, Campbell MK, Blazeby JM, Carr AJ, Weijer C, Cuthbertson BH, Buchbinder R, Pinkney T, Bishop FL, Pugh J, Cousins S, Harris I, Lohmander LS, Blencowe N, Gillies K, Probst P, Brennan C, Cook A, Farrar-Hockley D, Savulescu J, Huxtable R, Rangan A, Tracey I, Brocklehurst P, Ferreira ML, Nicholl J, Reeves BC, Hamdy F, Rowley SC, Lee N, Cook JA. Placebo comparator group selection and use in surgical trials: the ASPIRE project including expert workshop. Health Technol Assess. 2021 Sep;25(53):1-52. doi: 10.3310/hta25530
    Type
    Article
    Handle
    http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14200/6178
    Additional Links
    https://www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk/hta/#/
    DOI
    10.3310/hta25530
    PMID
    34505829
    Journal
    Health Technology Assessment
    Publisher
    NIHR Journals Library
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.3310/hta25530
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    Health Care Services

    entitlement

    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2025)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.