Safety of growth hormone replacement in survivors of cancer and intracranial and pituitary tumours: a consensus statement.
Author
Boguszewski, Margaret C SBoguszewski, Cesar L
Chemaitilly, Wassim
Cohen, Laurie E
Gebauer, Judith
Higham, Claire
Hoffman, Andrew R
Polak, Michel
Yuen, Kevin C J
Alos, Nathalie
Antal, Zoltan
Bidlingmaier, Martin
Biller, Beverley M K
Brabant, George
Choong, Catherine S Y
Cianfarani, Stefano
Clayton, Peter E
Coutant, Regis
Cardoso-Demartini, Adriane A
Fernandez, Alberto
Grimberg, Adda
Guðmundsson, Kolbeinn
Guevara-Aguirre, Jaime
Ho, Ken K Y
Horikawa, Reiko
Isidori, Andrea M
Jørgensen, Jens Otto Lunde
Kamenicky, Peter
Karavitaki, Niki
Kopchick, John J
Lodish, Maya
Luo, Xiaoping
McCormack, Ann I
Meacham, Lillian
Melmed, Shlomo
Mostoufi Moab, Sogol
Müller, Hermann L
Neggers, Sebastian J C M M
Aguiar Oliveira, Manoel H
Ozono, Keiichi
Pennisi, Patricia A
Popovic, Vera
Radovick, Sally
Savendahl, Lars
Touraine, Philippe
van Santen, Hanneke M
Johannsson, Gudmundur
Publication date
2022-04-21
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Growth hormone (GH) has been used for over 35 years, and its safety and efficacy has been studied extensively. Experimental studies showing the permissive role of GH/insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-I) in carcinogenesis have raised concerns regarding the safety of GH replacement in children and adults who have received treatment for cancer and those with intracranial and pituitary tumours. A consensus statement was produced to guide decision-making on GH replacement in children and adult survivors of cancer, in those treated for intracranial and pituitary tumours and in patients with increased cancer risk. With the support of the European Society of Endocrinology, the Growth Hormone Research Society convened a Workshop, where 55 international key opinion leaders representing 10 professional societies were invited to participate. This consensus statement utilized: (1) a critical review paper produced before the Workshop, (2) five plenary talks, (3) evidence-based comments from four breakout groups, and (4) discussions during report-back sessions. Current evidence reviewed from the proceedings from the Workshop does not support an association between GH replacement and primary tumour or cancer recurrence. The effect of GH replacement on secondary neoplasia risk is minor compared to host- and tumour treatment-related factors. There is no evidence for an association between GH replacement and increased mortality from cancer amongst GH-deficient childhood cancer survivors. Patients with pituitary tumour or craniopharyngioma remnants receiving GH replacement do not need to be treated or monitored differently than those not receiving GH. GH replacement might be considered in GH-deficient adult cancer survivors in remission after careful individual risk/benefit analysis. In children with cancer predisposition syndromes, GH treatment is generally contraindicated but may be considered cautiously in select patients.Citation
Boguszewski MCS, Boguszewski CL, Chemaitilly W, Cohen LE, Gebauer J, Higham C, Hoffman AR, Polak M, Yuen KCJ, Alos N, Antal Z, Bidlingmaier M, Biller BMK, Brabant G, Choong CSY, Cianfarani S, Clayton PE, Coutant R, Cardoso-Demartini AA, Fernandez A, Grimberg A, Guðmundsson K, Guevara-Aguirre J, Ho KKY, Horikawa R, Isidori AM, Jørgensen JOL, Kamenicky P, Karavitaki N, Kopchick JJ, Lodish M, Luo X, McCormack AI, Meacham L, Melmed S, Mostoufi Moab S, Müller HL, Neggers SJCMM, Aguiar Oliveira MH, Ozono K, Pennisi PA, Popovic V, Radovick S, Savendahl L, Touraine P, van Santen HM, Johannsson G. Safety of growth hormone replacement in survivors of cancer and intracranial and pituitary tumours: a consensus statement. Eur J Endocrinol. 2022 Apr 21;186(6):P35-P52. doi: 10.1530/EJE-21-1186Type
ArticleOther
Additional Links
https://eje.bioscientifica.comPMID
35319491Publisher
Oxford University Pressae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1530/EJE-21-1186