Prediagnosis pathway benchmarking audit in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy
Author
Gowda, Vasantha LakshmiFernandez, Miguel
Prasad, Manish
Childs, Anne-Marie
Hughes, Imelda
Tirupathi, Sandya
De Goede, Christian Gaudentius Engelbert Lourens
O'Rourke, Declan
Parasuraman, Deepak
Willis, Tracey
Saberian, Samira
Davidson, Ian
Affiliation
Evelina London Children's Hospital; Queen's Medical Centre; Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust; Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust; Royal Belfast Hospital for Sick Children; Royal Preston Hospital; Children's Health Ireland at Temple Street; University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust; Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust; OPEN HEALTH; PTC Therapeutics LimitedPublication date
2022-10-02
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Objective: To describe age and time at key stages in the Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) prediagnosis pathway at selected centres to identify opportunities for service improvement. Design: A multicentre retrospective national audit. Setting: Nine tertiary neuromuscular centres across the UK and Ireland. A prior single-centre UK audit of 20 patients with no DMD family history provided benchmark criteria. Patients: Patients with a definitive diagnosis of DMD documented within 3 years prior to December 2018 (n=122). Main outcome measures: Mean age (months) at four key stages in the DMD diagnostic pathway and mean time (months) of presentational and diagnostic delay, and time from first reported symptoms to definitive diagnosis. Type of symptoms was also recorded. Results: Overall, mean age at definitive diagnosis, age at first engagement with healthcare professional (HCP) and age at first reported symptoms were 53.9±29.7, 49.9±28.9 and 36.4±26.8 months, respectively. The presentational delay and time to diagnosis were 21.1 (±21.1) and 4.6 (±7.9) months, respectively. The mean time from first reported symptoms to definitive diagnosis was 24.2±20.9. The percentages of patients with motor and/or non-motor symptoms recorded were 88% (n=106/121) and 47% (n=57/121), respectively. Conclusions: Majority of data mirrored the benchmark audit. However, while the time to diagnosis was shorter, a presentational delay was observed. Failure to recognise early symptoms of DMD could be a contributing factor and represents an unmet need in the diagnosis pathway. Methods determining how to improve this need to be explored.Citation
Gowda VL, Fernandez M, Prasad M, Childs AM, Hughes I, Tirupathi S, De Goede CGEL, O'Rourke D, Parasuraman D, Willis T, Saberian S, Davidson I. Prediagnosis pathway benchmarking audit in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Arch Dis Child. 2022 Feb;107(2):160-165. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2020-321451. Epub 2021 Jul 8.Type
ArticleAdditional Links
https://adc.bmj.com/PMID
34244165Journal
Archives of Disease in ChildhoodPublisher
BMJ Publishing Groupae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1136/archdischild-2020-321451