Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSriranganathan, Danujan
dc.contributor.authorKilic, Yakup
dc.contributor.authorNabil Quraishi, Mohammed
dc.contributor.authorSegal, Jonathan P
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-29T10:01:12Z
dc.date.available2024-10-29T10:01:12Z
dc.date.issued2021-12-03
dc.identifier.citationSriranganathan D, Kilic Y, Nabil Quraishi M, Segal JP. Prevalence of pouchitis in both ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis. 2022 Jan;24(1):27-39. doi: 10.1111/codi.15995. Epub 2021 Dec 3.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1462-8910
dc.identifier.eissn1463-1318
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/codi.15995
dc.identifier.pmid34800326
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14200/6279
dc.description.abstractAim: Pouchitis is a clinically significant complication of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis with its prevalence varying in the literature. Pouchitis is thought to occur more commonly in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) than in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). We conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis of all published literature to report the prevalence of pouchitis in all pouch patients as well as specifically in UC and FAP. We also investigated the prevalence of acute and chronic pouchitis in UC and FAP. Methods: A meta-analysis was conducted by searching the Embase, Embase Classic and PubMed databases between 1978 and 2021 exploring the prevalence of pouchitis in UC and FAP. We then performed a random effects model in order to find the pooled prevalence of pouchitis and used odds ratios to report differences in the prevalence of pouchitis in UC and FAP. Results: Fifty-nine full papers and conference abstracts were included in the meta-analysis comprising 18 117 patients with UC and 860 with FAP. The prevalence of pouchitis in UC was 0.32 (95% CI 0.27-0.37) and in FAP was found to be 0.06 (95% CI 0.03-0.15). The odds ratio of pouchitis in UC patients compared with FAP patients was 4.95 (95% CI 3.17-7.72, P < 0.0001). Conclusions: Our findings support the consensus that the prevalence of pouchitis is higher in UC than in FAP. More significantly our findings suggest that the true prevalence of pouchitis is higher than commonly reported in the literature. This literature may help counsel patients prior to undergoing restorative proctocolectomy.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBlackwell Scienceen_US
dc.relation.urlhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/14631318en_US
dc.rights© 2021 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.
dc.subjectGastroenterologyen_US
dc.titlePrevalence of pouchitis in both ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis: A systematic review and meta-analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.source.journaltitleColorectal Diseaseen_US
dc.source.volume24
dc.source.issue1
dc.source.beginpage27
dc.source.endpage39
dc.source.countryEngland
rioxxterms.versionNAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust; University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust; Hillingdon Hospitals NHS Foundation Trusten_US
oa.grant.openaccessnaen_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record