• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust
    • Medicine
    • Gastro
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust
    • Medicine
    • Gastro
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of West Midlands Evidence RepositoryCommunitiesAuthorsTitlesPublication DateSubjectsPublication TypesJournalPublisherThis CollectionAuthorsTitlesPublication DateSubjectsPublication TypesJournalPublisherProfilesView

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    About

    AboutPolicies Privacy NoticeBlack Country Healthcare NHS Foundation TrustCoventry and Warwickshire Partnership NHS TrustDudley Group NHS Foundation TrustGeorge Eliot Hospital NHS TrustSandwell and West Birmingham NHS TrustSouth Warwickshire University NHS Foundation TrustUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation TrustUniversity Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS TrustWalsall Healthcare NHS Trust

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Rationalizing polyp matching criteria in colon capsule endoscopy: an international expert consensus through RAND (modified DELPHI) process

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Author
    Lei, Ian Io
    Koulaouzidis, Anastasios
    Baatrup, Gunnar
    Samaan, Mark
    Parisi, Ioanna
    McAlindon, Mark
    Toth, Ervin
    Shaukat, Aasma
    Valentiner, Ursula
    Dabos, Konstantinos John
    Fernandez, Ignacio
    Robertson, Alexander
    Schelde-Olesen, Benedicte
    Parsons, Nicholas
    Arasaradnam, Ramesh P
    Show allShow less
    Affiliation
    University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust
    Publication date
    2024-06-12
    Subject
    Gastroenterology
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Creating criteria and standards for matching polyps (abnormal growth in the bowels) on colon capsule video analysis: an international expert agreement using the RAND (modified Delphi process) process Background: Doctors often use colon capsule endoscopy (CCE), a high-tech capsule with two cameras, to record and check for diseases in the small and large bowels as the capsule travels through the intestines. One of the most common conditions in the large bowel is polyps, which are abnormal growths in the lining of the bowel. Comparing and matching polyps in the same video from the capsule can be tricky as they look very similar, leading to the possibility of incorrectly reporting the same polyp twice or more. This can lead to wrong results and inaccuracies. The literature did not have any criteria or standards for matching polyps in CCE before. Aim: Using the RAND/UCLA (modified Delphi) process, this study aims to identify the key factors or components used to match polyps within a CCE video. The goal is to explore each factor and create complete criteria for polyp matching based on the agreement from international experts. Method: A group of 11 international CCE experts came together to evaluate a survey with 60 statements. They anonymously rated each statement on a scale from 1 to 9 (1-3: inappropriate, 4-6: uncertain, and 7-9: appropriate). After discussing the Round 1 results virtually, a Round 2 survey with the same but revised questions was created and completed before the final analysis of their agreement. Results: The main factors for matching polyps are 1) the timing when the polyp was seen, 2) where it is in the bowel, 3) its blood vessel pattern, 4) size, 5) the timing of its appearance between cameras, 6) surrounding tissue features, 7) its shape, and 8) surface features. If five or more of these factors match, the compared polyps are likely the same. Conclusion: This study establishes the first complete criteria for matching polyps in CCE. While it may not provide a definitive solution for matching challenging and small polyps, these criteria serve as a guide to help and make the process of polyp matching easier.
    Citation
    Authors: Ian Io Lei , Anastasios Koulaouzidis, Gunnar Baatrup, Mark Samaan, Ioanna Parisi, Mark McAlindon, Ervin Toth , Aasma Shaukat, Ursula Valentiner, Konstantinos John Dabos, Ignacio Fernandez, Alexander Robertson, Benedicte Schelde-Olesen, Nicholas Parsons, CESCAIL Core Group and Ramesh P. Arasaradnam Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology, 2024, Vol. 17: 1–12,DOI: 10.1177/17562848241242681
    Type
    Article
    Handle
    http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14200/6487
    Additional Links
    DOI: 10.1177/17562848241242681
    DOI
    10.1177/17562848241242681
    PMID
    38883159
    Journal
    Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology
    Publisher
    Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1177/17562848241242681
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    Gastro

    entitlement

    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2025)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.