Rationalizing polyp matching criteria in colon capsule endoscopy: an international expert consensus through RAND (modified DELPHI) process
Author
Lei, Ian IoKoulaouzidis, Anastasios
Baatrup, Gunnar
Samaan, Mark
Parisi, Ioanna
McAlindon, Mark
Toth, Ervin
Shaukat, Aasma
Valentiner, Ursula
Dabos, Konstantinos John
Fernandez, Ignacio
Robertson, Alexander
Schelde-Olesen, Benedicte
Parsons, Nicholas
Arasaradnam, Ramesh P
Affiliation
University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS TrustPublication date
2024-06-12Subject
Gastroenterology
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Creating criteria and standards for matching polyps (abnormal growth in the bowels) on colon capsule video analysis: an international expert agreement using the RAND (modified Delphi process) process Background: Doctors often use colon capsule endoscopy (CCE), a high-tech capsule with two cameras, to record and check for diseases in the small and large bowels as the capsule travels through the intestines. One of the most common conditions in the large bowel is polyps, which are abnormal growths in the lining of the bowel. Comparing and matching polyps in the same video from the capsule can be tricky as they look very similar, leading to the possibility of incorrectly reporting the same polyp twice or more. This can lead to wrong results and inaccuracies. The literature did not have any criteria or standards for matching polyps in CCE before. Aim: Using the RAND/UCLA (modified Delphi) process, this study aims to identify the key factors or components used to match polyps within a CCE video. The goal is to explore each factor and create complete criteria for polyp matching based on the agreement from international experts. Method: A group of 11 international CCE experts came together to evaluate a survey with 60 statements. They anonymously rated each statement on a scale from 1 to 9 (1-3: inappropriate, 4-6: uncertain, and 7-9: appropriate). After discussing the Round 1 results virtually, a Round 2 survey with the same but revised questions was created and completed before the final analysis of their agreement. Results: The main factors for matching polyps are 1) the timing when the polyp was seen, 2) where it is in the bowel, 3) its blood vessel pattern, 4) size, 5) the timing of its appearance between cameras, 6) surrounding tissue features, 7) its shape, and 8) surface features. If five or more of these factors match, the compared polyps are likely the same. Conclusion: This study establishes the first complete criteria for matching polyps in CCE. While it may not provide a definitive solution for matching challenging and small polyps, these criteria serve as a guide to help and make the process of polyp matching easier.Citation
Authors: Ian Io Lei , Anastasios Koulaouzidis, Gunnar Baatrup, Mark Samaan, Ioanna Parisi, Mark McAlindon, Ervin Toth , Aasma Shaukat, Ursula Valentiner, Konstantinos John Dabos, Ignacio Fernandez, Alexander Robertson, Benedicte Schelde-Olesen, Nicholas Parsons, CESCAIL Core Group and Ramesh P. Arasaradnam Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology, 2024, Vol. 17: 1–12,DOI: 10.1177/17562848241242681Type
ArticleAdditional Links
DOI: 10.1177/17562848241242681PMID
38883159Publisher
Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterologyae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1177/17562848241242681