Drug utilisation study in hospitalised chronic kidney disease patients, using World Health Organisation prescribing indicators: an observational study
Publication date
2024-12-04Subject
PharmacologyUrology
Public health. Health statistics. Occupational health. Health education
Diseases & disorders of systemic, metabolic or environmental origin
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Background: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with comorbidities and altered pharmacokinetics, making appropriate prescribing, and monitoring necessary to minimise drug-related problems (DRPs). Therefore, this study aimed to describe the drug-utilisation pattern in hospitalised CKD patients. Methods: An observational study was conducted in hospitalised adult (≥18 years old) CKD patients in the UK using WHO prescribing indicators, from November 2021 to April 2022 in a large teaching hospital in England from admission until discharge. This study used STATA version 16 for analysis. Results: The mean number of drugs per prescription was 11.1(±5), the percentage of encounters resulting in the prescription of an antibiotic was 62%, the percentage of drugs prescribed by generic name was 90%, the percentage of encounters resulting in the prescription of an injection was 94%, and the percentage of drugs prescribed from essential drugs list or formulary was 89%. The most frequent drug group prescribed Alimentary Tract and Metabolism was 22%. Longer hospital stays, admission to a renal ward, and the number of comorbidities were independently associated with polypharmacy. Conclusion: Not all prescribing indicators evaluated in this study were in full compliance with WHO recommendations. Polypharmacy was found in most participants which might require interventions to avoid DRPs. Further research is needed to evaluate factors associated with prescribing in the CKD population and prescriber perspectives on decision-making in the context of available guidelines and patient factors.Citation
Alruqayb WS, Paudyal V, Malcolm P, Sarwar A, Aston J, Cox AR. Drug utilisation study in hospitalised chronic kidney disease patients, using World Health Organisation prescribing indicators: an observational study. J Pharm Policy Pract. 2024 Dec 4;17(1):2430436. doi: 10.1080/20523211.2024.2430436.Type
ArticleAdditional Links
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/20523211.2024.2430436?rfr_dat=cr_pub++0pubmed&url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori%3Arid%3Acrossref.orgPMID
39640417Publisher
BioMed Centralae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1080/20523211.2024.2430436
Scopus Count
Collections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Role of the Guidelines Evidence Specialist in the streamlining of Guidelines at a large acute NHS TrustHeer, Mandeep; Heer, Mandeep; Heer, Mandeep; CEBIS; CEBIS (University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, 2023-11)Role of the Guidelines Evidence Specialist in the streamlining of Guidelines at a large acute NHS Trust
-
Enhancing wellbeing in medical practice: Exploring interventions and effectiveness for improving the work lives of resident (junior) doctors: A systematic review and narrative synthesis.Hirayama, Yuri; Khan, Sunera; Gill, Charn; Thoburn, Maxwell; Hancox, Jennifer; Muzaffar, Jameel; Hiriyama, Yuri; Khan, Sunera; Gill, Charn; Hancox, Jennifer; et al. (Elsevier Ltd, 2024-10-16)Introduction: Globally, resident doctors face challenges like long work hours, critical decision-making stress, and exposure to death and distress, prompting concern for their wellbeing. This study addresses the need for interventions to improve their working conditions, vital for enhancing quality of life, patient care and retaining a skilled workforce. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic literature review until 3 January 2024 explored interventions for resident Ddoctors pre- and post-COVID-19. It evaluated intervention effectiveness, metrics and feasibility, excluding studies with high bias risk. Results: The review identified diverse interventions, from mentoring to wellness resources, showing significant improvements in job satisfaction, mental health and professional growth among resident doctors. Due to methodological variations, a narrative synthesis was conducted. Conclusion: Effective interventions addressing resident doctors' challenges can notably enhance their wellbeing and job satisfaction. Scaling such interventions is vital for fostering supportive work environments, sustaining the healthcare workforce and improving patient care quality.
-
Faculty development: clinical dermatology for medical secretaries and administrative staffAgrawal, Rishi; Browne, Rachel; Baldwin, Nicola; Scott, H.; Tso, Simon; Agrawal, R.; Browne, R.; Baldwin, N.; Scott, H.; Tso, S.; et al. (Oxford University Press, 2020-06)A study investigating the potential benefits of specialty-specific clinical inductions for medical secretaries and administrative staff.