Low vs. conventional intra-abdominal pressure in laparoscopic colorectal surgery : a prospective cohort study
Author
Hamid, MohammedZaman, Shafquat
Mostafa, Omar Ezzat Saber
Deutsch, Alex
Bird, Jonty
Kawesha, Anthony
Reay, Michael
Banga, Irmeet
Williams, Anna
Waterland, Peter
Akingboye, Akinfemi
Affiliation
Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust; Walsall Healthcare NHS Trust; University Hospital of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust; University of Birmingham; Aston University Medical SchoolPublication date
2024-12-18Subject
Surgery
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
A total of 120 patients were included of which 69 (57.5%) were male. Median age and BMI of the cohort was 67 years (51-75 years) and 27 kg/m2 (24-32 kg/m2), respectively. 61 (50.8%) patients were categorised as an ASA grade 3. Two (1.7%) patients had diverticular disease; 31 (25.9%) had IBD, and 87 (72.4%) were operated on for colonic malignancy. Low IAP (8mmHg) was used in 53 (44.2%) cases, whilst the remainder (55.8%) had IAP set at 15mmHg (conventional). Low-pressure surgery was associated with improved intraoperative lung compliance (p < 0.001) and peak inspiratory pressures up to 6 h (p < 0.001); reduced analgesic requirement (p ≤ 0.028), and decreased postoperative pain both at rest (p = 0.001) and on exertion (p < 0.001). Moreover, low IAP was associated with an earlier time to pass flatus postoperatively (p = 0.047) with no significant difference in length of hospital stay (p = 0.574). Additionally, no significant difference was observed between the groups for outcomes including median operating time (p = 0.089), conversion to open surgery (p = 0.056), overall complication rate (p = 0.102), and 90-day mortality (p = 0.381).Citation
Hamid M, Zaman S, Mostafa OES, Deutsch A, Bird J, Kawesha A, Reay M, Banga I, Williams A, Waterland P, Akingboye A. Low vs. conventional intra-abdominal pressure in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a prospective cohort study. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Dec 18;410(1):12. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03579-3. PMID: 39692883.Type
ArticlePMID
39692883Publisher
Springerae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1007/s00423-024-03579-3