School food policy in secondary schools in England and its impact on adolescents' diets and dental health: the FUEL multiple-methods study.
Author
Pallan, MirandaMurphy, Marie
Morrison, Breanna
Pokhilenko, Irina
Sitch, Alice
Frew, Emma
Rawdin, Clare
Adams, Rachel
Adamson, Ashley
Bartington, Suzanne
Dobell, Alexandra
Duff, Rhona
Griffin, Tania
Hurley, Kiya
Lancashire, Emma
McLeman, Louise
Passmore, Sandra
Ravaghi, Vahid
Spence, Suzanne
Adab, Peymane
Publication date
2024-11Subject
Public health. Health statistics. Occupational health. Health educationPaediatrics
Diet & nutrition
Dentistry
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Background: School food standards are a legal requirement for state-funded schools in England and are designed to promote healthy eating in pupils. However, state-funded academies/free schools established between 2010 and 2014 are exempt from this legislation. To complement the school food standards, the government launched the School Food Plan in 2013, which outlines voluntary actions that schools can take to support healthy eating and increase school meal uptake. There has been little evaluation of the school food standards and School Food Plan in secondary schools. Objectives: To compare implementation and costs of the school food standards and School Food Plan, and pupil dietary and dental outcomes in two groups of secondary schools: those mandated and those not mandated to comply with the school food standards legislation. Methods: An observational, multiple-methods study. We sampled state-funded secondary school academies/free schools, pupils aged 11-15 years, and school staff/governors with a role in food provision/education from the Midlands. We collected qualitative data in four schools. The primary outcome was pupil free sugar intake at lunch; across the school day; and during 24-hours. Secondary outcomes were additional nutritional outcomes and dental caries measures. We assessed school food standards/School Food Plan implementation and costs using researcher observation, document analysis, and surveys with staff/governors, schools and pupils. Dietary intake and dental outcomes were measured online using 24-hour dietary recall and surveys, respectively. In the qualitative study we conducted staff/governor interviews and pupil focus groups in a subsample of schools. We used multilevel analyses to explore variation in pupil outcomes across the school food standards-mandated and school food standards-non-mandated school groups. Data were analysed using the Framework approach. Results: Thirty-six schools (13 school food standards-mandated, 23 school food standards-non-mandated), 2453 pupils and 151 staff/governors participated. On average, schools were compliant with 64% of school food standards and implemented 41% of School Food Plan actions, with no differences across school food standards-mandated/non-mandated schools. There was a wide variation in annual costs of the school food standards and School Food Plan reported by schools (mean of £195 per pupil). Pupils in school food standards-mandated schools had lower lunch intakes of free sugar than those in school food standards-non-mandated schools (adjusted mean difference = -2.78 g, 95% confidence interval -4.66 to -0.90 g). After further adjustment for total energy intake, there was no significant difference in free sugar intake, but the school food standards-mandated group had lower fruit and vegetable intake at all time points, and higher consumption of confectionery during the school day and sugar-sweetened beverages over 24 hours. There were no differences in dental outcomes between the two groups. Twenty-one staff/governors and 137 pupils participated in the qualitative study. Staff described balancing school food standards compliance with conflicting priorities related to financial viability. Some pupils felt that school food did not meet their needs for convenience, speed, value for money and taste, and disliked the lunchtime experience. Little time was afforded to healthy-eating education within the curriculum. Limitations: There were large numbers of missing data for some study elements, including assessment of some School Food Plan actions and cost data. Conclusions: In the secondary school context, the current school food standards are difficult to comply with and the School Food Plan has not achieved the desired outcomes. We found no evidence to show that school food standards legislation has positively influenced nutritional intake. Future research: We need to develop healthy secondary-school food provision models that meet pupils' preferences, and better understand how to situate the food and healthy-eating agenda in secondary schools. Trial registration: This trial is registered as ISRCTN68757496. Funding: This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Public Health Research programme (NIHR award ref: 17/92/39) and is published in full in Public Health Research; Vol. 12, No. 12. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.Citation
Pallan M, Murphy M, Morrison B, Pokhilenko I, Sitch A, Frew E, Rawdin C, Adams R, Adamson A, Bartington S, Dobell A, Duff R, Griffin T, Hurley K, Lancashire E, McLeman L, Passmore S, Ravaghi V, Spence S, Adab P. School food policy in secondary schools in England and its impact on adolescents' diets and dental health: the FUEL multiple-methods study. Public Health Res (Southampt). 2024 Nov;12(12):1-167. doi: 10.3310/TTPL8570.Type
ArticleOther
Additional Links
https://www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk/phr/#/DOI
10.3310/TTPL8570PMID
39545569Publisher
NIHR Journals Libraryae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.3310/TTPL8570
Scopus Count
Collections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Role of the Guidelines Evidence Specialist in the streamlining of Guidelines at a large acute NHS TrustHeer, Mandeep; Heer, Mandeep; Heer, Mandeep; CEBIS; CEBIS (University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, 2023-11)Role of the Guidelines Evidence Specialist in the streamlining of Guidelines at a large acute NHS Trust
-
Enhancing wellbeing in medical practice: Exploring interventions and effectiveness for improving the work lives of resident (junior) doctors: A systematic review and narrative synthesis.Hirayama, Yuri; Khan, Sunera; Gill, Charn; Thoburn, Maxwell; Hancox, Jennifer; Muzaffar, Jameel; Hiriyama, Yuri; Khan, Sunera; Gill, Charn; Hancox, Jennifer; et al. (Elsevier Ltd, 2024-10-16)Introduction: Globally, resident doctors face challenges like long work hours, critical decision-making stress, and exposure to death and distress, prompting concern for their wellbeing. This study addresses the need for interventions to improve their working conditions, vital for enhancing quality of life, patient care and retaining a skilled workforce. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic literature review until 3 January 2024 explored interventions for resident Ddoctors pre- and post-COVID-19. It evaluated intervention effectiveness, metrics and feasibility, excluding studies with high bias risk. Results: The review identified diverse interventions, from mentoring to wellness resources, showing significant improvements in job satisfaction, mental health and professional growth among resident doctors. Due to methodological variations, a narrative synthesis was conducted. Conclusion: Effective interventions addressing resident doctors' challenges can notably enhance their wellbeing and job satisfaction. Scaling such interventions is vital for fostering supportive work environments, sustaining the healthcare workforce and improving patient care quality.
-
Faculty development: clinical dermatology for medical secretaries and administrative staffAgrawal, Rishi; Browne, Rachel; Baldwin, Nicola; Scott, H.; Tso, Simon; Agrawal, R.; Browne, R.; Baldwin, N.; Scott, H.; Tso, S.; et al. (Oxford University Press, 2020-06)A study investigating the potential benefits of specialty-specific clinical inductions for medical secretaries and administrative staff.