Evaluating the Efficacy and Cost-Effectiveness of Plasmapheresis and Intravenous Immunoglobulin in Acute Guillain-Barre Syndrome Management in Emergency Departments
Author
Ullah, WaseemAli, Haider
Muhammad, Yasir
Ullah, Naqeeb
Khalil, Iqra
Ahmad, Sohail
Ullah, Obaid
Ali, Amjad
Ali, Muhammad Y
Manan, Awais
Safdar, Sundas
Hanfi, Hanifullah.
Affiliation
The Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust; Khyber Teaching Hospital; Lady Reading Hospital et alPublication date
2024-11-29
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS) is a severe autoimmune neuropathy that has to be treated quickly and efficiently in emergency situations, when both cost and effectiveness are vital. To compare the clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of plasmapheresis and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) in managing acute GBS in emergency departments. A prospective observational study conducted from January to December 2023 evaluated the treatment of adults with acute GBS using IVIG or plasmapheresis. Cost analysis was done in conjunction with clinical outcomes assessment, such as improvement in motor function, length of recovery, and length of hospital stay. Each therapy group consisted of 39 individuals, and data were gathered via patient evaluations and medical records. Through statistical analysis, the two regimens' costs and results were compared. Plasmapheresis proved significantly more cost-effective than IVIG, with an average treatment cost of 295,000 Pakistani rupees (PKR) per patient versus 587,000 PKR for IVIG. Plasmapheresis showed a greater mean improvement in motor function (Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score change of 5.93 � 2.17) compared to IVIG (4.98 � 2.34), though the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.091). Recovery time was slightly shorter with plasmapheresis, averaging 8.26 � 1.53 weeks versus 8.74 � 1.87 weeks for IVIG (p=0.282). Hospital length of stay was marginally reduced with plasmapheresis (12.16 � 3.28 days) compared to IVIG (12.95 � 3.64 days, p=0.302). The time to reach maximum improvement was also shorter with plasmapheresis (6.51 � 1.24 weeks) compared to IVIG (7.08 � 1.32 weeks, p=0.260). Additionally, plasmapheresis had a lower complication rate, with 4 out of 39 patients (10.25%) experiencing complications, compared to 8 out of 39 patients (20.51%) with IVIG. Plasmapheresis is more cost-effective than IVIG for acute GBS management in emergency departments, offering similar or potentially superior clinical outcomes at a lower cost.Citation
Ullah W, Ali H, Muhammad Y, Ullah N, Khalil I, Ahmad S, Ullah O, Ali A, Ali MY, Manan A, Safdar S, Hanfi H. Evaluating the Efficacy and Cost-Effectiveness of Plasmapheresis and Intravenous Immunoglobulin in Acute Guillain-Barre Syndrome Management in Emergency Departments. Cureus. 2024 Oct 29;16(10):e72595. doi: 10.7759/cureus.72595.PMID
39610626Publisher
Cureusae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.7759/cureus.72595