Gender, race and ethnicity biases experienced by hospital physicians: an umbrella review to explore emerging biases in the evidence base.
Affiliation
University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS TrustPublication date
2025-02-16Subject
Wessex Classification Subject Headings::SociologyWessex Classification Subject Headings::Health services. Management
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Objectives: To examine the authorship and content of systematic reviews (SRs) of biases experienced by medical professionals through a gender lens. Design: Review of SRs. Data sources: We searched PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO and CINAHL from inception. Searches were conducted in May 2022 and updated in October 2023. Eligibility criteria: Reviews of studies reporting biases experienced by hospital physicians at any stage of their careers and in any country. Reviews were included if they used systematic methods to search the literature and synthesise the data. Non-English language publications were excluded. Data extraction and synthesis: The main theme of each eligible review was identified through qualitative thematic analysis. We used NamSor to determine the first/last authors' gender and computed the proportion of female authors for each review theme. Results: 56 articles were included in the review. These covered 12 themes related to gender, race and ethnicity bias experienced by physicians at any stage of their careers. The overall proportion of female authors was 70% for first authors and 51% for last authors. However, the gender of authors by theme varied widely. Female authors dominated reviews of research on discrimination and motherhood, while male authors dominated reviews on burnout, mental health and earnings. Only six reviews were identified that included race and ethnicity; 9 out of the 12 first and last authors were female. Conclusions: Understanding the potential for a gendered evidence base on biases experienced by hospital physicians is important. Our findings highlight apparent differences in the issues being prioritised internationally by male and female authors, and a lack of evidence on interventions to tackle biases. Going forward, a more collaborative and comprehensive framework is required to develop an evidence base that is fit for purpose. By providing a point of reference, the present study can help this future development.Citation
BMJ Open . 2025 Feb 16;15(2):e094549Type
ArticleAdditional Links
https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/15/2/e094549https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11831289/
PMID
39956599Journal
BMJ OpenPublisher
BMJae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1136/bmjopen-2024-094549