Transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) : surgery without using a 3-way catheter
Author
Jones, AdamEhsanullah, Syed Ali
Birring, Amerdip
Gascoigne, Connor
Singh, Sid
Ginepri, Andrea
Apakama, Ike
Affiliation
George Eliot Hospital, Nuneaton; University of LeicesterPublication date
2018-09-24
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) continues to be an effective intervention for certain indications; and this procedure is still one of the most commonly performed in urology. The use of a 3-way catheter with continuous bladder irrigation (CBI) post-TURP is widely practiced in a bid to prevent clot retention. We report our unique experience with the use of 2-way urethral catheters post-TURP surgery. Methodology Data was prospectively collected for 143 consecutive patients who underwent a bipolar TURP between July 2015 and October 2017. The following outcomes where measured and compared against the literature: resection time, resected weight, haemoglobin level, hospital stay, catheterization days, transfusion rate and complications. Results Two-way 18-French catheters were used in 132/143 (91.7%) patients. The remaining 11/143 (8.3%) patients had a 3-way 22-French catheter and CBI immediately post-TURP. There were no incidences of clot retention requiring a return to theatre. There were 2/132 (1.5%) patients requiring transfusion who received 2-way catheterization. The average resection time was 44.8 (10-100) minutes, with a mean resected weight of 22.8 (2.0-70.0) grams. Post-operatively, we found minimal drop in haemoglobin levels, with a fall of 0.7 g/dL on average, with a range of 0.1-3.4 g/dL. Mean length of stay following TURP was 1.45 days (1-18), and 101/132 (76.5%) of patients had a successful trial without catheter on the first post-operative day. Conclusion Our outcomes compare favorably with the published data. This study suggests it may be possible to reduce the cost and resources associated with the use of 3-way catheters and CBI post-TURP surgery by using a 2-way catheter instead. Despite this, appropriate patient selection for this novel technique needs to be adopted. Our results would suggest that patients with smaller prostates or limited resections might be suitable for a 2-way urethral catheter post-TURP.Citation
Jones A, Ehsanullah SA, Birring A, Gascoigne C, Singh S, Ginepri A, Apakama I. Transurethral Resection of Prostate (Turp): Surgery Without Using a 3-Way Catheter. J Endolum Endourol. 2018 Aug 21;1(2):e4-e9. doi: 10.22374/jeleu.v1i2.7.Type
ArticlePublisher
University of Toronto Pressae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.22374/jeleu.v1i2.7