A new definition for metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease: An international expert consensus statement.
Name:
Publisher version
View Source
Access full-text PDFOpen Access
View Source
Check access options
Check access options
Author
Eslam, MohammedNewsome, Philip N
Sarin, Shiv K
Anstee, Quentin M
Targher, Giovanni
Romero-Gomez, Manuel
Zelber-Sagi, Shira
Wai-Sun Wong, Vincent
Dufour, Jean-François
Schattenberg, Jörn M
Kawaguchi, Takumi
Arrese, Marco
Valenti, Luca
Shiha, Gamal
Tiribelli, Claudio
Yki-Järvinen, Hannele
Fan, Jian-Gao
Grønbæk, Henning
Yilmaz, Yusuf
Cortez-Pinto, Helena
Oliveira, Claudia P
Bedossa, Pierre
Adams, Leon A
Zheng, Ming-Hua
Fouad, Yasser
Chan, Wah-Kheong
Mendez-Sanchez, Nahum
Ahn, Sang Hoon
Castera, Laurent
Bugianesi, Elisabetta
Ratziu, Vlad
George, Jacob
Publication date
2020-04-08Subject
Public health. Health statistics. Occupational health. Health educationEndocrinology
Diabetes
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
The exclusion of other chronic liver diseases including "excess" alcohol intake has until now been necessary to establish a diagnosis of metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD). However, given our current understanding of the pathogenesis of MAFLD and its rising prevalence, "positive criteria" to diagnose the disease are required. In this work, a panel of international experts from 22 countries propose a new definition for the diagnosis of MAFLD that is both comprehensive and simple, and is independent of other liver diseases. The criteria are based on evidence of hepatic steatosis, in addition to one of the following three criteria, namely overweight/obesity, presence of type 2 diabetes mellitus, or evidence of metabolic dysregulation. We propose that disease assessment and stratification of severity should extend beyond a simple dichotomous classification to steatohepatitis vs. non-steatohepatitis. The group also suggests a set of criteria to define MAFLD-associated cirrhosis and proposes a conceptual framework to consider other causes of fatty liver disease. Finally, we bring clarity to the distinction between diagnostic criteria and inclusion criteria for research studies and clinical trials. Reaching consensus on the criteria for MAFLD will help unify the terminology (e.g. for ICD-coding), enhance the legitimacy of clinical practice and clinical trials, improve clinical care and move the clinical and scientific field of liver research forward.Citation
Eslam M, Newsome PN, Sarin SK, Anstee QM, Targher G, Romero-Gomez M, Zelber-Sagi S, Wai-Sun Wong V, Dufour JF, Schattenberg JM, Kawaguchi T, Arrese M, Valenti L, Shiha G, Tiribelli C, Yki-Järvinen H, Fan JG, Grønbæk H, Yilmaz Y, Cortez-Pinto H, Oliveira CP, Bedossa P, Adams LA, Zheng MH, Fouad Y, Chan WK, Mendez-Sanchez N, Ahn SH, Castera L, Bugianesi E, Ratziu V, George J. A new definition for metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease: An international expert consensus statement. J Hepatol. 2020 Jul;73(1):202-209. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.03.039. Epub 2020 Apr 8Type
ArticleOther
Additional Links
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/01688278PMID
32278004Journal
Journal of HepatologyPublisher
Elsevierae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.jhep.2020.03.039