• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Coventry and Warwickshire Partnership NHS Trust
    • Neurodevelopmental Disorders
    • Intellectual DIsorders
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Coventry and Warwickshire Partnership NHS Trust
    • Neurodevelopmental Disorders
    • Intellectual DIsorders
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of West Midlands Evidence RepositoryCommunitiesAuthorsTitlesPublication DateSubjectsPublication TypesJournalPublisherThis CollectionAuthorsTitlesPublication DateSubjectsPublication TypesJournalPublisherProfilesView

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    About

    AboutPolicies Privacy NoticeBlack Country Healthcare NHS Foundation TrustCoventry and Warwickshire Partnership NHS TrustDudley Group NHS Foundation TrustGeorge Eliot Hospital NHS TrustSandwell and West Birmingham NHS TrustSouth Warwickshire University NHS Foundation TrustUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation TrustUniversity Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS TrustWalsall Healthcare NHS Trust

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    A novel way to understand and communicate the burden of Antipsychotic Prescribing for Adults across Specialist Intellectual Disability Services in England and Wales: the APHID feasibility study protocol

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Author
    Stanyard, Emily
    Neilens, Helen
    Allgar, Victoria
    Bailey, Matthew
    Musicha, Crispin
    Purandare, Kiran cc
    Perera, Bhathika cc
    Roy, Ashok cc
    sawhney, indermeet cc
    Watkins, Lance
    Jaydeokar, Sujeet
    Lennard, Sarah
    Mitchell, Sarah
    McGowan, Paula
    Laugharne, Richard cc
    Tromans, Samuel
    Shankar, Rohit cc
    Show allShow less
    Affiliation
    University of Plymouth; Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust; University College London; Coventry and Warwickshire Partnership NHS Trust; Hertfordshire Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust; University of South Wales; Cheshire and Wirral Partnership, NHS Foundation Trust; Cornwall Partnership NHS Foundation Trust; University of Leicester; Peninsula Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Plymouth
    Publication date
    2025
    Subject
    Pharmacology
    Mental health
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    BackgroundThe stopping overmedication of people with a learning disability, autism, or both (STOMP) programme was launched in 2016 in response to concerns about the over-prescribing of medication in people with intellectual disability. The programmes focus has been on the withdrawal of antipsychotic treatment for the individual person than the service or dosage optimisation. It could be that cumulative service level antipsychotic treatment converted and presented as chlorpromazine units could allow for comparison of services on how antipsychotic treatment is being utilised and allow for comparing of practices between services in different regions. The aim of this feasibility study is to explore if cumulative service scores of antipsychotic treatment burden could define prescribing patterns across different specialist intellectual disability services in England and Wales, focused on those on ≥2 antipsychotic treatments. There is no evidence to use ≥2 antipsychotic treatments for any individual.MethodsThe study is a feasibility cross-sectional study investigating service antipsychotic treatment cumulative burden at seven annual time points, 2017-2023. De-identified data for adult patients with intellectual disability under the care of specialist intellectual disability services in receipt of ≥2 oral and/or long-acting IM (intramuscular) injectable (depot) antipsychotic treatments are included. Demographic and clinical data will be collated, in addition to information on the prescribed antipsychotic treatments. The data will be evaluated for data completeness and will be inputted into the Statistical Process Control tool. Outcomes will be measured using a combination of methods including descriptive analysis (including mean, standard deviation and percentage values), and a mixed effects regression model, to determine changes in chlorpromazine equivalent dose values over time. ResultsSeven England and Wales National Health Service intellectual disability services are recruiting up to 490 people. There were recognised challenges in identifying the relevant eligible cohort across services and administering a common set of outcome measures. Discussion This study is intended to inform decisions to design a wider registry that would involve antipsychotic treatment prescribing data for patients across multiple sites nationwide. Developing a de-identified database using routinely collected data, without the requirement for informed consent, comes with unique benefits and challenges.
    Citation
    Stanyard, E., Neilens, H., Allgar, V., Bailey, M., Musicha, C., Purandare, K., Perera, B., & Roy, A. (2025). A novel way to understand and communicate the burden of Antipsychotic Prescribing for Adults across Specialist Intellectual Disability Services in England and Wales: the APHID feasibility study protocol. Frontiers in Health Services, 5, Article 1393805. https://doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2025.1393805
    Type
    Article
    Handle
    http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14200/7642
    Additional Links
    https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/health-services/articles/10.3389/frhs.2025.1393805/abstract
    DOI
    10.3389/frhs.2025.1393805
    Journal
    Frontiers in Health Services
    Publisher
    Frontiers Media
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.3389/frhs.2025.1393805
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    Medicines Management
    Intellectual DIsorders

    entitlement

    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2025)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.