It is time to define an organizational model for the prevention and management of infections along the surgical pathway: a worldwide cross-sectional survey.
Author
Sartelli, MassimoLabricciosa, Francesco M
Coccolini, Federico
Coimbra, Raul
Abu-Zidan, Fikri M
Ansaloni, Luca
Al-Hasan, Majdi N
Ansari, Shamshul
Barie, Philip S
Caínzos, Miguel Angel
Ceresoli, Marco
Chiarugi, Massimo
Claridge, Jeffrey A
Cicuttin, Enrico
Dellinger, Evan Patchen
Fry, Donald E
Guirao, Xavier
Hardcastle, Timothy Craig
Hecker, Andreas
Leppäniemi, Ari K
Litvin, Andrey
Marwah, Sanjay
Maseda, Emilio
Mazuski, John E
Memish, Ziad Ahmed
Kirkpatrick, Andrew W
Pagani, Leonardo
Podda, Mauro
Rasa, Huseyin Kemal
Sakakushev, Boris E
Sawyer, Robert G
Tumietto, Fabio
Xiao, Yonghong
Aboubreeg, Wedad Faraj
Adamou, Harissou
Akhmeteli, Lali
Akin, Emrah
Alberio, Maria Grazia
Alconchel, Felipe
Magagi, Ibrahim Amadou
Araúz, Ana Belén
Argenio, Giulio
Atanasov, Boyko C
Atici, Semra Demirli
Awad, Selmy Sabry
Baili, Efstratia
Bains, Lovenish
Bala, Miklosh
Baraket, Oussama
Baral, Suman
Belskii, Vladislav A
Benboubker, Moussa
Ben-Ishay, Offir
Bordoni, Pierpaolo
Boumédiène, Abdalia
Brisinda, Giuseppe
Cavazzuti, Laura
Chandy, Sujith J
Chiarello, Maria Michela
Cillara, Nicola
Clarizia, Guglielmo
Cocuz, Maria-Elena
Cocuz, Iuliu Gabriel
Conti, Luigi
Coppola, Raffaella
Cui, Yunfeng
Czepiel, Jacek
D'Acapito, Fabrizio
Damaskos, Dimitrios
Das, Koray
De Simone, Belinda
Delibegovic, Samir
Demetrashvili, Zaza
Detanac, Dzemail S
Dhingra, Sameer
Di Bella, Stefano
Dimitrov, Evgeni N
Dogjani, Agron
D'Oria, Mario
Dumitru, Irina Magdalena
Elmangory, Mutasim M
Enciu, Octavian
Fantoni, Massimo
Filipescu, Daniela
Fleres, Francesco
Foghetti, Domitilla
Fransvea, Pietro
Gachabayov, Mahir
Galeiras, Rita
Gattuso, Gianni
Ghannam, Wagih M
Ghisetti, Valeria
Giraudo, Giorgio
Gonfa, Kebebe Bekele
Gonullu, Emre
Hamad, Yousif Tag Elsir Y
Hecker, Matthias
Isik, Arda
Ismail, Nizar
Ismail, Azzain
Jain, Sumita Agarwal
Kanj, Souha S
Kapoor, Garima
Karaiskos, Ilias
Kavalakat, Alfie J
Kenig, Jakub
Khamis, Faryal
Khokha, Vladimir
Kiguba, Ronald
Kim, Jae Il
Kobe, Yoshiro
Kok, Kenneth Yuh Yen
Kovacevic, Bojan M
Kryvoruchko, Igor Andreevich
Kuriyama, Akira
Landaluce-Olavarria, Aitor
Lasithiotakis, Konstantinos
Lohsiriwat, Varut
Lostoridis, Eftychios
Luppi, Davide
Vega, Gustavo Miguel Machain
Maegele, Marc
Marinis, Athanasios
Martines, Gennaro
Martínez-Pérez, Aleix
Massalou, Damien
Mesina, Cristian
Metan, Gökhan
Miranda-Novales, María Guadalupe
Mishra, Shyam Kumar
Mohamed, Mohaned Ibrahim Hussein
Mohamedahmed, Ali Yasen Y
Mora-Guzmán, Ismael
Mulita, Francesk
Musina, Ana-Maria
Navsaria, Pradeep H
Negoi, Ionut
Nita, Gabriela Elisa
O'Connor, Donal B
Ordoñez, Carlos Alberto
Pantalone, Desiré
Panyko, Arpád
Papadopoulos, Aristeidis
Pararas, Nikolaos
Pata, Francesco
Patel, Tapan
Pellino, Gianluca
Perra, Teresa
Perrone, Gennaro
Pesce, Antonio
Pintar, Tadeja
Popivanov, Georgi Ivanov
Porcu, Alberto
Quiodettis, Martha Alexa
Rahim, Razrim
Mitul, Ashrarur Rahman
Reichert, Martin
Rems, Miran
Campbell, Glendee Yolande Reynolds
Rocha-Pereira, Nuno
Rodrigues, Gabriel
Villamil, Gustavo Eduardo Roncancio
Rossi, Stefano
Sall, Ibrahima
Kafil, Hossein Samadi
Sasia, Diego
Seni, Jeremiah
Seretis, Charalampos
Serradilla-Martín, Mario
Shelat, Vishal G
Siribumrungwong, Boonying
Slavchev, Mihail
Solaini, Leonardo
Tan, Boun Kim
Tarasconi, Antonio
Tartaglia, Dario
Toma, Elena Adelina
Tomadze, Gia
Toro, Adriana
Tovani-Palone, Marcos Roberto
van Goor, Harry
Vasilescu, Alin
Vereczkei, Andras
Veroux, Massimiliano
Weckmann, Sergio Alberto
Widmer, Lukas Werner
Yahya, AliIbrahim
Zachariah, Sanoop K
Zakaria, Andee Dzulkarnaen
Zubareva, Nadezhda
Zuidema, Wietse P
Di Carlo, Isidoro
Cortese, Francesco
Baiocchi, Gian Luca
Maier, Ronald V
Catena, Fausto
Publication date
2022-03-17Subject
Surgery
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Background: The objectives of the study were to investigate the organizational characteristics of acute care facilities worldwide in preventing and managing infections in surgery; assess participants' perception regarding infection prevention and control (IPC) measures, antibiotic prescribing practices, and source control; describe awareness about the global burden of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and IPC measures; and determine the role of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 pandemic on said awareness. ethods: A cross-sectional web-based survey was conducted contacting 1432 health care workers (HCWs) belonging to a mailing list provided by the Global Alliance for Infections in Surgery. The self-administered questionnaire was developed by a multidisciplinary team. The survey was open from May 22, 2021, and June 22, 2021. Three reminders were sent, after 7, 14, and 21 days. Results: Three hundred four respondents from 72 countries returned a questionnaire, with an overall response rate of 21.2%. Respectively, 90.4% and 68.8% of participants stated their hospital had a multidisciplinary IPC team or a multidisciplinary antimicrobial stewardship team. Local protocols for antimicrobial therapy of surgical infections and protocols for surgical antibiotic prophylaxis were present in 76.6% and 90.8% of hospitals, respectively. In 23.4% and 24.0% of hospitals no surveillance systems for surgical site infections and no monitoring systems of used antimicrobials were implemented. Patient and family involvement in IPC management was considered to be slightly or not important in their hospital by the majority of respondents (65.1%). Awareness of the global burden of AMR among HCWs was considered very important or important by 54.6% of participants. The COVID-19 pandemic was considered by 80.3% of respondents as a very important or important factor in raising HCWs awareness of the IPC programs in their hospital. Based on the survey results, the authors developed 15 statements for several questions regarding the prevention and management of infections in surgery. The statements may be the starting point for designing future evidence-based recommendations. Conclusion: Adequacy of prevention and management of infections in acute care facilities depends on HCWs behaviours and on the organizational characteristics of acute health care facilities to support best practices and promote behavioural change. Patient involvement in the implementation of IPC is still little considered. A debate on how operationalising a fundamental change to IPC, from being solely the HCWs responsibility to one that involves a collaborative relationship between HCWs and patients, should be opened.Citation
Sartelli M, Labricciosa FM, Coccolini F, Coimbra R, Abu-Zidan FM, Ansaloni L, Al-Hasan MN, Ansari S, Barie PS, Caínzos MA, Ceresoli M, Chiarugi M, Claridge JA, Cicuttin E, Dellinger EP, Fry DE, Guirao X, Hardcastle TC, Hecker A, Leppäniemi AK, Litvin A, Marwah S, Maseda E, Mazuski JE, Memish ZA, Kirkpatrick AW, Pagani L, Podda M, Rasa HK, Sakakushev BE, Sawyer RG, Tumietto F, Xiao Y, Aboubreeg WF, Adamou H, Akhmeteli L, Akin E, Alberio MG, Alconchel F, Magagi IA, Araúz AB, Argenio G, Atanasov BC, Atici SD, Awad SS, Baili E, Bains L, Bala M, Baraket O, Baral S, Belskii VA, Benboubker M, Ben-Ishay O, Bordoni P, Boumédiène A, Brisinda G, Cavazzuti L, Chandy SJ, Chiarello MM, Cillara N, Clarizia G, Cocuz ME, Cocuz IG, Conti L, Coppola R, Cui Y, Czepiel J, D'Acapito F, Damaskos D, Das K, De Simone B, Delibegovic S, Demetrashvili Z, Detanac DS, Dhingra S, Di Bella S, Dimitrov EN, Dogjani A, D'Oria M, Dumitru IM, Elmangory MM, Enciu O, Fantoni M, Filipescu D, Fleres F, Foghetti D, Fransvea P, Gachabayov M, Galeiras R, Gattuso G, Ghannam WM, Ghisetti V, Giraudo G, Gonfa KB, Gonullu E, Hamad YTEY, Hecker M, Isik A, Ismail N, Ismail A, Jain SA, Kanj SS, Kapoor G, Karaiskos I, Kavalakat AJ, Kenig J, Khamis F, Khokha V, Kiguba R, Kim JI, Kobe Y, Kok KYY, Kovacevic BM, Kryvoruchko IA, Kuriyama A, Landaluce-Olavarria A, Lasithiotakis K, Lohsiriwat V, Lostoridis E, Luppi D, Vega GMM, Maegele M, Marinis A, Martines G, Martínez-Pérez A, Massalou D, Mesina C, Metan G, Miranda-Novales MG, Mishra SK, Mohamed MIH, Mohamedahmed AYY, Mora-Guzmán I, Mulita F, Musina AM, Navsaria PH, Negoi I, Nita GE, O'Connor DB, Ordoñez CA, Pantalone D, Panyko A, Papadopoulos A, Pararas N, Pata F, Patel T, Pellino G, Perra T, Perrone G, Pesce A, Pintar T, Popivanov GI, Porcu A, Quiodettis MA, Rahim R, Mitul AR, Reichert M, Rems M, Campbell GYR, Rocha-Pereira N, Rodrigues G, Villamil GER, Rossi S, Sall I, Kafil HS, Sasia D, Seni J, Seretis C, Serradilla-Martín M, Shelat VG, Siribumrungwong B, Slavchev M, Solaini L, Tan BK, Tarasconi A, Tartaglia D, Toma EA, Tomadze G, Toro A, Tovani-Palone MR, van Goor H, Vasilescu A, Vereczkei A, Veroux M, Weckmann SA, Widmer LW, Yahya A, Zachariah SK, Zakaria AD, Zubareva N, Zuidema WP, Di Carlo I, Cortese F, Baiocchi GL, Maier RV, Catena F. It is time to define an organizational model for the prevention and management of infections along the surgical pathway: a worldwide cross-sectional survey. World J Emerg Surg. 2022 Mar 17;17(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s13017-022-00420-4Type
ArticlePMID
35300731Publisher
BMCae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1186/s13017-022-00420-4
Scopus Count
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Immunogenicity of third dose COVID-19 vaccine strategies in patients who are immunocompromised with suboptimal immunity following two doses (OCTAVE-DUO): an open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial.Goodyear, Carl S; Patel, Amit; Patel, Amit; Barnes, Eleanor; Barnes, Eleanor; Willicombe, Michelle; Willicombe, Michelle; Siebert, Stefan; de Silva, Thushan I; de Silva, Thushan I; et al. (Elsevier, 2024-05-08)Background: The humoral and T-cell responses to booster COVID-19 vaccine types in multidisease immunocompromised individuals who do not generate adequate antibody responses to two COVID-19 vaccine doses, is not fully understood. The OCTAVE DUO trial aimed to determine the value of third vaccinations in a wide range of patients with primary and secondary immunodeficiencies. Methods: OCTAVE-DUO was a prospective, open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial investigating humoral and T-cell responses in patients who are immunocompromised following a third vaccine dose with BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273, and of NVX-CoV2373 for those with lymphoid malignancies. We recruited patients who were immunocompromised from 11 UK hospitals, aged at least 18 years, with previous sub-optimal responses to two doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Participants were randomly assigned 1:1 (1:1:1 for those with lymphoid malignancies), stratified by disease, previous vaccination type, and anti-spike antibody response following two doses. Individuals with lived experience of immune susceptibility were involved in the study design and implementation. The primary outcome was vaccine-specific immunity defined by anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike antibodies (Roche Diagnostics UK and Ireland, Burgess Hill, UK) and T-cell responses (Oxford Immunotec, Abingdon, UK) before and 21 days after the third vaccine dose analysed by a modified intention-to-treat analysis. The trial is registered with the ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN 15354495, and the EU Clinical Trials Register, EudraCT 2021-003632-87, and is complete. Findings: Between Aug 4, 2021 and Mar 31, 2022, 804 participants across nine disease cohorts were randomly assigned to receive BNT162b2 (n=377), mRNA-1273 (n=374), or NVX-CoV2373 (n=53). 356 (45%) of 789 participants were women, 433 (55%) were men, and 659 (85%) of 775 were White. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike antibodies measured 21 days after the third vaccine dose were significantly higher than baseline pre-third dose titres in the modified intention-to-treat analysis (median 1384 arbitrary units [AU]/mL [IQR 4·3-7990·0] compared with median 11·5 AU/mL [0·4-63·1]; p<0·001). Of participants who were baseline low responders, 380 (90%) of 423 increased their antibody concentrations to more than 400 AU/mL. Conversely, 166 (54%) of 308 baseline non-responders had no response after the third dose. Detectable T-cell responses following the third vaccine dose were seen in 494 (80%) of 616 participants. There were 24 serious adverse events (BNT612b2 eight [33%] of 24, mRNA-1273 12 [50%], NVX-CoV2373 four [17%]), two (8%) of which were categorised as vaccine-related. There were seven deaths (1%) during the trial, none of which were vaccine-related. Interpretation: A third vaccine dose improved the serological and T-cell response in the majority of patients who are immunocompromised. Individuals with chronic renal disease, lymphoid malignancy, on B-cell targeted therapies, or with no serological response after two vaccine doses are at higher risk of poor response to a third vaccine dose. Funding: Medical Research Council, Blood Cancer UK.
-
Definition, diagnosis and treatment of oligometastatic oesophagogastric cancer: a Delphi consensus study in Europe.Kroese, Tiuri E; van Laarhoven, Hanneke W M; Schoppman, Sebastian F; Deseyne, Pieter R A J; van Cutsem, Eric; Haustermans, Karin; Nafteux, Philippe; Thomas, Melissa; Obermannova, Radka; Mortensen, Hanna R; et al. (Elsevier, 2023-02-24)Background: Local treatment improves the outcomes for oligometastatic disease (OMD, i.e. an intermediate state between locoregional and widespread disseminated disease). However, consensus about the definition, diagnosis and treatment of oligometastatic oesophagogastric cancer is lacking. The aim of this study was to develop a multidisciplinary European consensus statement on the definition, diagnosis and treatment of oligometastatic oesophagogastric cancer. Methods: In total, 65 specialists in the multidisciplinary treatment for oesophagogastric cancer from 49 expert centres across 16 European countries were requested to participate in this Delphi study. The consensus finding process consisted of a starting meeting, 2 online Delphi questionnaire rounds and an online consensus meeting. Input for Delphi questionnaires consisted of (1) a systematic review on definitions of oligometastatic oesophagogastric cancer and (2) a discussion of real-life clinical cases by multidisciplinary teams. Experts were asked to score each statement on a 5-point Likert scale. The agreement was scored to be either absent/poor (<50%), fair (50%-75%) or consensus (≥75%). Results: A total of 48 experts participated in the starting meeting, both Delphi rounds, and the consensus meeting (overall response rate: 71%). OMD was considered in patients with metastatic oesophagogastric cancer limited to 1 organ with ≤3 metastases or 1 extra-regional lymph node station (consensus). In addition, OMD was considered in patients without progression at restaging after systemic therapy (consensus). For patients with synchronous or metachronous OMD with a disease-free interval ≤2 years, systemic therapy followed by restaging to consider local treatment was considered as treatment (consensus). For metachronous OMD with a disease-free interval >2 years, either upfront local treatment or systemic treatment followed by restaging was considered as treatment (fair agreement). Conclusion: The OMEC project has resulted in a multidisciplinary European consensus statement for the definition, diagnosis and treatment of oligometastatic oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma and squamous cell cancer. This can be used to standardise inclusion criteria for future clinical trials.
-
Risk of lung disease in the PI*SS genotype of alpha-1 antitrypsin: an EARCO research project.Martín, Teresa; Guimarães, Catarina; Esquinas, Cristina; Torres-Duran, Maria; Turner, Alice M; Tanash, Hanan; Rodríguez-García, Carlota; Corsico, Angelo; López-Campos, José Luis; Bartošovská, Eva; et al. (BioMed Central, 2024-06-26)Background: The PI*S variant is one of the most prevalent mutations within alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency (AATD). The risk of developing AATD-related lung disease in individuals with the PI*SS genotype is poorly defined despite its substantial prevalence. Our study aimed to characterize this genotype and its risk for lung disease and compare it with the PI*ZZ and PI*SZ genotypes using data from the European Alpha-1 antitrypsin Deficiency Research Collaboration international registry. Method: Demographic, clinical, functional, and quality of life (QoL) parameters were assessed to compare the PI*SS characteristics with the PI*SZ and PI*ZZ controls. A propensity score with 1:3 nearest-neighbour matching was performed for the most important confounding variables. Results: The study included 1007 individuals, with PI*SS (n = 56; 5.6%), PI*ZZ (n = 578; 57.4%) and PI*SZ (n = 373; 37.0%). The PI*SS population consisted of 58.9% men, with a mean age of 59.2 years and a mean FEV1(% predicted) of 83.4%. Compared to PI*ZZ individuals they had less frequent lung disease (71.4% vs. 82.2%, p = 0.037), COPD (41.4% vs. 60%, p = 0.002), and emphysema (23.2% vs. 51.9%, p < 0.001) and better preserved lung function, fewer exacerbations, lower level of dyspnoea, and better QoL. In contrast, no significant differences were found in the prevalence of lung diseases between PI*SS and PI*SZ, or lung function parameters, exacerbations, dyspnoea, or QoL. Conclusions: We found that, as expected, the risk of lung disease associated with the PI*SS genotype is significantly lower compared with PI*ZZ, but does not differ from that observed in PI*SZ individuals, despite having higher serum AAT levels. Trial registration: www. Clinicaltrials: gov (ID: NCT04180319). Keywords: Alpha-1 antitrypsin; Lung disease; PI*SS; Registries.