Perry, Benjamin IanAyadurai, NirmalanHess, EmilyHarmer, DavidCurry, ThomasBroom, RebeccaWhite, David2025-02-042025-02-042018-11-27Perry, B. I., Ayadurai, N., Hess, E., Harmer, D., Curry, T., Broom, R., & White, D. (2019). Use of a proforma to aid in reducing coercion into informal admission for acute adult psychiatric inpatients in the U.K. Legal Medicine, 36, 103–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.legalmed.2018.11.01110.1016/j.legalmed.2018.11.011http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14200/7173Background People with acute psychiatric illness may be at risk of coercion into informal admission. A lack of capacity assessment (CA) and provision of adequate information (PAI) for informal patients may constitute a risk of coercive admitting practice, resulting in increased use of the mental health act (MHA) in the days following admission. We developed and tested a proforma to aid in ensuring CA and PAI for informal admissions. Method A pilot case-study was conducted in 2015 at a U.K. NHS trust (n = 50), analysing the prevalence of CA & PAI for adult psychiatric inpatient admissions, alongside the prevalence of MHA use in the next 72 h. Case-note audits were completed in 2016 & 2017 (n = 100 each), to assess the impact of the proforma in improving documented CA & PAI, alongside the prevalence of MHA use in the next 72 h. We tested for any demographic associations with CA & PAI using logistic regression. Results CA improved from 39% (2015) to 60% (2017). PAI improved from 9% (2015) to 45% (2017). Use of the MHA in the 72 h following admission fell from 32% (2015) to 7% (2017). Most informal admissions detained within 72 h had no record of CA & PAI. People under the age of 26 years were significantly less likely to have documented CA & PAI. Implications Use of the proforma was successful in improving CA & PAI in a U.K. population. Further improvements could be made. Future research should seek to further examine demographic differences in informal coercion.enMental healthHealth services. ManagementArticle